freshie wrote:Watching MOTD and there are quite a few empty seats at the Swamp haha
Those cockneys missed a treat.
freshie wrote:Watching MOTD and there are quite a few empty seats at the Swamp haha
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:sheblue wrote:Watching the last 15 mins of rags v brighton. Rags holding on there at the end at HOME in the old toilet shithole.
The players look lost.
The end is nigh.
The end is nigh.
This followed the stream I watched. How the fuck are they second. They worry me in that it reminds me when Van Perse was there. Dogshit and yet scraped win after win.
Hanging on grimly while Bournemouth had a right go. Counter attacking? They couldn't string two passes together with half the park to aim at!
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:West Brom, Newcastle and Stoke are all looking very vulnerable at the wrong end of the table at the moment; all of them just hovering above the drop zone.
nottsblue wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:West Brom, Newcastle and Stoke are all looking very vulnerable at the wrong end of the table at the moment; all of them just hovering above the drop zone.
Looks like at least one of those could feasibly go down. Hope it's Stoke.
BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:West Brom, Newcastle and Stoke are all looking very vulnerable at the wrong end of the table at the moment; all of them just hovering above the drop zone.
Looks like at least one of those could feasibly go down. Hope it's Stoke.
In fairness, the bottom half of the table is incredibly close, and, with the fixture congestion at the moment, a team in the relegation zone could easily find themselves in the 'comfort' of midtable 7 days later.
BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:West Brom, Newcastle and Stoke are all looking very vulnerable at the wrong end of the table at the moment; all of them just hovering above the drop zone.
Looks like at least one of those could feasibly go down. Hope it's Stoke.
In fairness, the bottom half of the table is incredibly close, and, with the fixture congestion at the moment, a team in the relegation zone could easily find themselves in the 'comfort' of midtable 7 days later.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Nigels Tackle wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:West Brom, Newcastle and Stoke are all looking very vulnerable at the wrong end of the table at the moment; all of them just hovering above the drop zone.
Looks like at least one of those could feasibly go down. Hope it's Stoke.
In fairness, the bottom half of the table is incredibly close, and, with the fixture congestion at the moment, a team in the relegation zone could easily find themselves in the 'comfort' of midtable 7 days later.
4 leagues in 1
there's us on our own for the title
rags/dippers/tarquins/chavs/yids for the other cl places
burnley/leicester/everton for the europa league
the rest are in a relegation battle
iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
Wonderwall wrote:Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
Also we have a first choice back four(when fit) of Walker Kompany Stones Mendy. None of these played last night and 3 of them are out injured.
Duckman wrote:Lol at the ref in the scum game
Ashley “a bird shat in my mouth” Young was three feet away on that last b’mouth free kick
Wonderwall wrote:Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
Also we have a first choice back four(when fit) of Walker Kompany Stones Mendy. None of these played last night and 3 of them are out injured.
Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
gmercer1 wrote:Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:How the hell are Utd as close as they are to City? Really bang average. Last 3 home games they have 2 scruffy ,lucky 1 nil wins and lucky to only lose by one against City.
Chelsea, LPool and Spurs seem better than them but just throw in silly results every so often. Maybe all will change in the 2nd half of the season.
Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
Ozil top class.......lazy ass maybe!
iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Dimples wrote:iwasthere2012 wrote:gmercer1 wrote:Doug, you have it all wrong mate.......its only City that have scraped through to wins over the last few games.......well that's according to SKY!
Joking aside, it’s the manner in which we’ve gone about our business compared to them. We have still played to our philosophy even losing key personnel.
We were going through a trough by our standards but still delivering.
They play the percentages all the time. That is why they are ahead of the much more attractive football being played by Liverpool,Arsenal, Spuds and Chelsea who are more susceptible to dropping clangers.
I still think it could go completely pear-shaped for them. There is only so many melt downs that the United hierarchy will tolerate.
He’ll leave that club in worse shape than he picked them up.
I never write them of.
They turn a pigs ear into a silk purse.
If they get a top class mid and forward they would be very close to us results wise, for ex, Bale and Ozil.
Light years away from us in terms of style, creativity, etc... but in terms of points on the board - very close.
Don't forget they were missing Pogba and Fellini last night
Ozil top class.......lazy ass maybe!
find it hard to imagine Ozil fitting into a Mourinho team.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, branny, carl_feedthegoat, CTID Hants, Dubciteh, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Outcast, Scatman, TomS and 87 guests