sheblue wrote:It's been a great but tough week.
We were tired looking at 70 mins which is no surprise.
Chelsea offered nothing much, very ordinary.
zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:Bernard’s English is better than mine!
Bernardo , speaks fluent French, is Portuguese and also speaks Spanish, so clearly a well read and intelligent young man.
mr_nool wrote:budfox wrote:Mase wrote:budfox wrote:For me now that is the Prem done and dusted.
Beat the rags and we only need two other wins.
We’ve got Everton and Stoke before them mate.
Yes I do know that, but winning against the rags effectively counts as two wins. If we lose to them we still need four wins, not three.
You have to throw Liverpool into the equation too.
aaron bond wrote:Sky pundits can’t stop praising us.
Beefymcfc wrote:Great win after a long week. Chelsea looked gash but only because we made them look like that. We were passing balls around them from the start which meant that none of them would risk being out of position; mesmerising.
And, where did RatBoy go in the second half? Hardly heard a word out of him until he had to give the MotM to Dave.
iwasthere2012 wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:Walker needs to sort his shit out
I’ve said it numerous times before, he’s fast and strong but he’s not a footballer I’m my book.
Needs to work on his passing. It’s atrocious.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:mr_nool wrote:budfox wrote:Mase wrote:budfox wrote:For me now that is the Prem done and dusted.
Beat the rags and we only need two other wins.
We’ve got Everton and Stoke before them mate.
Yes I do know that, but winning against the rags effectively counts as two wins. If we lose to them we still need four wins, not three.
You have to throw Liverpool into the equation too.
I'd rather just throw Liverpuddle into the Mersey.
budfox wrote:
I did throw the Dippers in. The most they can get is 87 points, which is what we will have with here more wins.
Goal difference is enough by a mile.
mr_nool wrote:budfox wrote:
I did throw the Dippers in. The most they can get is 87 points, which is what we will have with here more wins.
Goal difference is enough by a mile.
Sorry mate, for some reason I thought they were only 15 behind.
budfox wrote:mr_nool wrote:budfox wrote:
I did throw the Dippers in. The most they can get is 87 points, which is what we will have with here more wins.
Goal difference is enough by a mile.
Sorry mate, for some reason I thought they were only 15 behind.
Nothing to apologise for, we're going to win the fucking Premiership!
Mase wrote:phips wrote:Swales4ever wrote:phips wrote:lads on NBC halftime saying Zinchenko shouldve seen red.
its debatable. his foot was fully extended, studs up, and high.
It belongs more to BS realm than debatable's, Phips.
Saw 3 replays nothing more than a professional faul: Zinch made sure his investment on a yellow card paid off but CLEARLY TOOK also cared not to cause physical harm.
youve seen reds given for that. its not about contact made or intent. i thought i remember something like: studs up, high, leg extended = red as of 2 seasons ago or something.
There’s absolutely no rule against studs up Phips.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:mr_nool wrote:budfox wrote:Mase wrote:budfox wrote:For me now that is the Prem done and dusted.
Beat the rags and we only need two other wins.
We’ve got Everton and Stoke before them mate.
Yes I do know that, but winning against the rags effectively counts as two wins. If we lose to them we still need four wins, not three.
You have to throw Liverpool into the equation too.
I'd rather just throw Liverpuddle into the Mersey.
aaron bond wrote:Sky pundits can’t stop praising us.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Beefymcfc, johnny crossan, Majestic-12 [Bot], Nickyboy, zuricity and 237 guests