aaron bond wrote:Alberto Moreno's tattoo from 2 years ago.
Remember the outrage...
It's the new Liverpool Crest.
Motto: Hear what we tell you, see what we show you, Stray off script and you pay for it!
aaron bond wrote:Alberto Moreno's tattoo from 2 years ago.
Remember the outrage...
aaron bond wrote:Alberto Moreno's tattoo from 2 years ago.
Remember the outrage...
zuricity wrote:Some Jerk at Glasgow live attacks Raza for his 'Derisory' 500,000 charity gift! Really !
If i was able to give 500,000 i would be a very happy fella.
johnny crossan wrote:zuricity wrote:Some Jerk at Glasgow live attacks Raza for his 'Derisory' 500,000 charity gift! Really !
If i was able to give 500,000 i would be a very happy fella.
I think it's ironic but could be wrong
https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/spo ... s-14725683
The perils of clicking a NewsNow link eh? - if only we all showed your virtuous restraint they'd be out of business! Can you sniff out the ones you're going to be offended by? But you'll never know if you were right unless some less fastidious reader like me stains his soulzuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:zuricity wrote:Some Jerk at Glasgow live attacks Raza for his 'Derisory' 500,000 charity gift! Really !
If i was able to give 500,000 i would be a very happy fella.
I think it's ironic but could be wrong
https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/spo ... s-14725683
ironic or not it's only been done for Clickbait which you obviously have done to get the link .
I didn't get that far because i don't care about the intention of the web page, rather the fact that some cnut sees it as a way to make money out of clicks.
Google and others are in serious need of regulation .
City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS NEWS issues an APOLOGY over its reporting yesterday of Raheem Sterling tattoo .
Yeah right ok SSN like you really mean it , reality is SSN and Murdoch have been found out .
The Sun and SSN both owned by Murdoch ?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:City64 wrote:SKY SPORTS NEWS issues an APOLOGY over its reporting yesterday of Raheem Sterling tattoo .
Yeah right ok SSN like you really mean it , reality is SSN and Murdoch have been found out .
The Sun and SSN both owned by Murdoch ?
They only apologized for saying the word '' Again'' and not apologized for the fuckign article itself.
johnny crossan wrote:The perils of clicking a NewsNow link eh? - if only we all showed your virtuous restraint they'd be out of business! Can you sniff out the ones you're going to be offended by? But you'll never know if you were right unless some less fastidious reader like me stains his soulzuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:zuricity wrote:Some Jerk at Glasgow live attacks Raza for his 'Derisory' 500,000 charity gift! Really !
If i was able to give 500,000 i would be a very happy fella.
I think it's ironic but could be wrong
https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/spo ... s-14725683
ironic or not it's only been done for Clickbait which you obviously have done to get the link .
I didn't get that far because i don't care about the intention of the web page, rather the fact that some cnut sees it as a way to make money out of clicks.
Google and others are in serious need of regulation .![]()
![]()
zuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:The perils of clicking a NewsNow link eh? - if only we all showed your virtuous restraint they'd be out of business! Can you sniff out the ones you're going to be offended by? But you'll never know if you were right unless some less fastidious reader like me stains his soulzuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:zuricity wrote:Some Jerk at Glasgow live attacks Raza for his 'Derisory' 500,000 charity gift! Really !
If i was able to give 500,000 i would be a very happy fella.
I think it's ironic but could be wrong
https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/sport/spo ... s-14725683
ironic or not it's only been done for Clickbait which you obviously have done to get the link .
I didn't get that far because i don't care about the intention of the web page, rather the fact that some cnut sees it as a way to make money out of clicks.
Google and others are in serious need of regulation .![]()
![]()
Fastidious ? not really. If you were you would recognize those sentences are written without any references or recognition of sources - As has been pointed out on this site for ages and why i didn't deem it worthwhile to link to it.
Whoever put that article together did it to attract clicks .Not one single sentence is based on true journalism, rather more a like a perverse form of gathering gossip à la Beeb . As if , somehow they are an authority on information .Newsnow is a hanger on, just like twitter. This thread is massive, we are continually informer about the extent so called 'Media' sources will go to get a buck . Legal , decent , honest and truthful ?Most fail this simple Advertising / Marketing test.
zuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Keep on deeming what you consider is a worthwhile link then by all means my friend.zuricity wrote:johnny crossan wrote:The perils of clicking a NewsNow link eh? - if only we all showed your virtuous restraint they'd be out of business! Can you sniff out the ones you're going to be offended by? But you'll never know if you were right unless some less fastidious reader like me stains his soulzuricity wrote:ironic or not it's only been done for Clickbait which you obviously have done to get the link .
I didn't get that far because i don't care about the intention of the web page, rather the fact that some cnut sees it as a way to make money out of clicks.
Google and others are in serious need of regulation .![]()
![]()
Fastidious ? not really. If you were you would recognize those sentences are written without any references or recognition of sources - As has been pointed out on this site for ages and why i didn't deem it worthwhile to link to it.
Whoever put that article together did it to attract clicks .Not one single sentence is based on true journalism, rather more a like a perverse form of gathering gossip à la Beeb . As if , somehow they are an authority on information .Newsnow is a hanger on, just like twitter. This thread is massive, we are continually informer about the extent so called 'Media' sources will go to get a buck . Legal , decent , honest and truthful ?Most fail this simple Advertising / Marketing test.
You obviously feel our clicky fingers clearly need your protection from the wilder shores of the perfidious internet.
Just try to ensure your description of the forbidden fruits is a little more accurate
No i was merely highlighting another negative article about a city player. Someone thought they could collect snippets and with clickbait keywords try to get some money that google might pay by feeding / supplying buzzwords. And who are you to decide what should be accurate or not , especially on a football blog ?
ian494 wrote:Zurich click and read it, it is a pisstake on the media shits reporting on sterling, it is not click bait
zuricity wrote:ian494 wrote:Zurich click and read it, it is a pisstake on the media shits reporting on sterling, it is not click bait
Er , i did read it , i didn't deem it fit to make a link to it because it chose to highlight things about raza in a negative light
zuricity wrote:ian494 wrote:Zurich click and read it, it is a pisstake on the media shits reporting on sterling, it is not click bait
Er , i did read it , i didn't deem it fit to make a link to it because it chose to highlight things about raza in a negative light
Nigels Tackle wrote:zuricity wrote:ian494 wrote:Zurich click and read it, it is a pisstake on the media shits reporting on sterling, it is not click bait
Er , i did read it , i didn't deem it fit to make a link to it because it chose to highlight things about raza in a negative light
honestly?!
zuricity wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:zuricity wrote:ian494 wrote:Zurich click and read it, it is a pisstake on the media shits reporting on sterling, it is not click bait
Er , i did read it , i didn't deem it fit to make a link to it because it chose to highlight things about raza in a negative light
honestly?!
yes and the whole point i am making is that people use a negative slant on something to get you to click. The headline itself highlights this negativity.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bear60, lonestay, Nigels Tackle, nottsblue, PeterParker, Stan, stupot and 125 guests