mr_nool wrote:I thought Morocco got totally done over against Portugal yesterday. They should have had at least one, possible two, penalties (blatant shove/jump in the back in the first half + Pepe's handball) but neither incident even got viewed. Today Australia got a penalty for a handball much less obvious than the Pepe's.
Beefymcfc wrote:mr_nool wrote:I thought Morocco got totally done over against Portugal yesterday. They should have had at least one, possible two, penalties (blatant shove/jump in the back in the first half + Pepe's handball) but neither incident even got viewed. Today Australia got a penalty for a handball much less obvious than the Pepe's.
They were totally dumbfounded on the radio that I was listening to, could not believe the decision.
mr_nool wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:mr_nool wrote:I thought Morocco got totally done over against Portugal yesterday. They should have had at least one, possible two, penalties (blatant shove/jump in the back in the first half + Pepe's handball) but neither incident even got viewed. Today Australia got a penalty for a handball much less obvious than the Pepe's.
They were totally dumbfounded on the radio that I was listening to, could not believe the decision.
Which one? Australia or Morocco?
mr_nool wrote:Yeah,it was a very strange call imo.
Beefymcfc wrote:mr_nool wrote:Yeah,it was a very strange call imo.
Still not seen it but I don't suppose I need to as they made the call from a booth without informing the fans what they seen. And that's the biggest part for me, if the fans don't see what they see it's open to corruption.
dazby wrote:His hand was in an unnatural position preventing a shot on goal. Pen.
dazby wrote:His hand was in an unnatural position preventing a shot on goal. Pen.
Beefymcfc wrote:dazby wrote:His hand was in an unnatural position preventing a shot on goal. Pen.
I would agree on most occasion as a player wants to spread himself but on this it's not the case.
This is your real opinion, not just being contraire?
RodneyRodney wrote:dazby wrote:His hand was in an unnatural position preventing a shot on goal. Pen.
Sorry Daz, but absolute cobblers . Danes well ripped of with that decision , which was on par with some of the most bent anti-City
penalty calls I've seen last 4-5 years.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I always suspected VAR woukd be used to benefit the usual suspects.
And if course it looks fair now.
Get rid of it.
dazby wrote:RodneyRodney wrote:dazby wrote:His hand was in an unnatural position preventing a shot on goal. Pen.
Sorry Daz, but absolute cobblers . Danes well ripped of with that decision , which was on par with some of the most bent anti-City
penalty calls I've seen last 4-5 years.
Same question to you Rodders. How were they ripped off? His had was in an unnatural position, stopping a shot on goal. Pen.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, Im_Spartacus, Nick, Nigels Tackle, nottsblue, PeterParker, sheblue, sniffer and 99 guests