mr_nool wrote:I thought it was an alright and flattering article if I'm honest.
johnny crossan wrote:mr_nool wrote:I thought it was an alright and flattering article if I'm honest.
don't recall any similar guides on how to beat the rags in their salad days, but it's probably my age
Nigels Tackle wrote:i take it as a compliment
Outcast wrote:Although I believe the BBC have an agenda against us mainly to please the dippers and rags audience albeit its starting to diminish the more we grow, don't think this article is used to discredit us, I find it rather complimentary.
johnny crossan wrote:Outcast wrote:Although I believe the BBC have an agenda against us mainly to please the dippers and rags audience albeit its starting to diminish the more we grow, don't think this article is used to discredit us, I find it rather complimentary.
You don't think there is a clear message there about how important it is we should be beaten for the greater good? (where that good means pleasing their large rag/dipper audience.)
johnny crossan wrote:mr_nool wrote:I thought it was an alright and flattering article if I'm honest.
don't recall any similar guides on how to beat the rags in their salad days, but it's probably my age
johnny crossan wrote:Outcast wrote:Although I believe the BBC have an agenda against us mainly to please the dippers and rags audience albeit its starting to diminish the more we grow, don't think this article is used to discredit us, I find it rather complimentary.
You don't think there is a clear message there about how important it is we should be beaten for the greater good? (where that good means pleasing their large rag/dipper audience.)
Outcast wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Outcast wrote:Although I believe the BBC have an agenda against us mainly to please the dippers and rags audience albeit its starting to diminish the more we grow, don't think this article is used to discredit us, I find it rather complimentary.
You don't think there is a clear message there about how important it is we should be beaten for the greater good? (where that good means pleasing their large rag/dipper audience.)
Don't get me started on the BBC, I'm trying to be partial and balanced otherwise we are no different from rags and dippers. Of course there is bias against us, but on this occasion, specifically this article, I don't believe they're having a dig. Personally, I find it complimentary how far ahead of the pack we are.
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:Play like the dippers then.
That analysis misses so much out, like how easily we could have beaten most of the teams that took points off us, with better finishing or less refereeing errors.
I can't see many managers using that as the basis of their planning.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mase, ruralblue, Scatman, stupot and 148 guests