Beefymcfc wrote:BT show the Lorente incident and the commentator automatically days 'Handball'.
budfox wrote:Just seen the replay.
At the point it touches Bernie, Serge is perhaps six inches offside, at most. In the next video frame he's level and onside.
A quarter final result has been affected by the merest split-second of play, and whilst it's easy to use technology and give a black or white ruling, something of the essence and spirit of the game is being lost here.
Also, to all intents and purposes, and within that passage of play, that should be a perfectly good goal. It deserved to win the match. Had it been a, pass from a City player to Serge offside by a few inches then fair enough, but the mere fact it touched Bernie should be irrelevant here. I would say that if the concept of "seeking to gain an advantage" can find a place in the laws of the game, itshoukd find a place here.
Bitter? Yes I am, but if I were a neutral I would say the same.
Blue In Bolton wrote:zuricity wrote:mr_nool wrote:nottsblue wrote:
there was a deflection off a City player, which was not a pass to kun , but a deflection and a perfectly good goal has been ruled offside .
Basically it is official cheating.
The deflection is surely irrelevant. The fact he passed the ball backwards to Kun renders him onside. The City player didn’t attempt to touch the ball so it can be argued he wasn’t in the passage of play intentionally. Goal for me
of course you are correct but don't let VAR and UEFA get in your way.
Bernie did not make a pass and Kun was onside when it hit bernie.
Not a single word about it was a Spurs player who passed the ball. Yes, Kun was in an offside position but it wasn’t a City player who PASSED it to him. Perhaps this is one of those amendments to the laws that have been brought in lately that I’ve missed.
Tokyo Blue wrote:budfox wrote:Just seen the replay.
At the point it touches Bernie, Serge is perhaps six inches offside, at most. In the next video frame he's level and onside.
A quarter final result has been affected by the merest split-second of play, and whilst it's easy to use technology and give a black or white ruling, something of the essence and spirit of the game is being lost here.
Also, to all intents and purposes, and within that passage of play, that should be a perfectly good goal. It deserved to win the match. Had it been a, pass from a City player to Serge offside by a few inches then fair enough, but the mere fact it touched Bernie should be irrelevant here. I would say that if the concept of "seeking to gain an advantage" can find a place in the laws of the game, itshoukd find a place here.
Bitter? Yes I am, but if I were a neutral I would say the same.
And there you have it. How VAR can be manipulated.
Hazy2 wrote:Gutted !
sheblue wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:BT show the Lorente incident and the commentator automatically days 'Handball'.
It wasn't a handball.
It was an utter embrassment to go out to that team conceding 3 goals at home to them.
We are the laughing stock of European football.
I knew we wouldn't win it but to go out to that shower is inexcusable.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Gutted !
Your man DS played a blinder....especially that corner he took.
lovecity8utd wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Gutted !
Your man DS played a blinder....especially that corner he took.
Boring twat. Fuck off and follow another team.
Outcast wrote:I hate football.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:lovecity8utd wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Gutted !
Your man DS played a blinder....especially that corner he took.
Boring twat. Fuck off and follow another team.
I piss Blue blood....so that's going to be impossible, fuck face.
Wonderwall wrote:Stood right next to the spurs fans tonight, they were shite for 80 minutes.
So, apparently the law next season is going to change which means Llorentes goal will not be allowed next season. Cheers, that's fucking great news, just 12 months too late.
Also, here is a thing. When we are all showed stills of an offside decision where a players arm is ahead of the defence but nothing else is, we are told by our media friends that it's not offside because it has to be a part of the body he can score with. REALLY, well Llorente scored tonight with the part he can't score with and the ref even watched if over and over again like an episode of friends on Dave.
Joke, what a shambles
Wonderwall wrote:Stood right next to the spurs fans tonight, they were shite for 80 minutes.
So, apparently the law next season is going to change which means Llorentes goal will not be allowed next season. Cheers, that's fucking great news, just 12 months too late.
Also, here is a thing. When we are all showed stills of an offside decision where a players arm is ahead of the defence but nothing else is, we are told by our media friends that it's not offside because it has to be a part of the body he can score with. REALLY, well Llorente scored tonight with the part he can't score with and the ref even watched if over and over again like an episode of friends on Dave.
Joke, what a shambles
Nigels Tackle wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Stood right next to the spurs fans tonight, they were shite for 80 minutes.
So, apparently the law next season is going to change which means Llorentes goal will not be allowed next season. Cheers, that's fucking great news, just 12 months too late.
Also, here is a thing. When we are all showed stills of an offside decision where a players arm is ahead of the defence but nothing else is, we are told by our media friends that it's not offside because it has to be a part of the body he can score with. REALLY, well Llorente scored tonight with the part he can't score with and the ref even watched if over and over again like an episode of friends on Dave.
Joke, what a shambles
how will the rule be changed?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests