***bfc v mcfc official match thread***

[carl_feedthegoat]

Take that.!!!

Didn't have you down as a fan.....

That goal saved me hitting something.

[bigblue]

How on Earth did they got a freekick there? Rodri didn't touch him

[PrezIke]

Would love for the golden boot to come down to a battle between Kun and Raz.

It could actually happen.

[bigblue]

Laporte is such an elegant defender

[PrezIke]

That's offsides, but the pen shout no way. Again, this is going to drive more and more fans bonkers.

[aaron bond]

Walker needs to be dropped. He was a liability last season and is the same this season.

[Nick]

Get cancelo or foden some game time

[Saul Goodman]

I'd almost forgotten just how much Mahrez kills our play

[city72]

Otamendi a liability now

[bigblue]

Well that looked a clear foul on Mahrez

[PrezIke]

(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

[carl_feedthegoat]

Commentator just loves to mention the price of a substitute coming on....wont hear that with other teams...just ours.

[Harry Dowd scored]

(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Heads they win, tails we lose w

[bigblue]

(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Stepping on someone's foot is not subjective

[PrezIke]

Sterling's hold up play is severely underrated.

[bigblue]

Not the best start from Cancelo

[PrezIke]

(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Stepping on someone's foot is not subjective

Exactly!

[Harry Dowd scored]

Nice three points regardless of fucking var

[Dameerto]

Commentator just loves to mention the price of a substitute coming on....wont hear that with other teams...just ours.

And the fact he cost us something like £26 million (net) doesn't seem to come into it with them.

[bigblue]