Harry Dowd scored wrote:Lots of people on bbc news feed saying City should forfeit the game, bit harsh is that
PrezIke wrote:Harry Dowd scored wrote:Lots of people on bbc news feed saying City should forfeit the game, bit harsh is that
Just wee bit, yeah
nottsblue wrote:Much as I am not disappointed to have to play Everton away just 2 days after our last game, this is wrong IMO.
We have a squad of 25. If we had 10 injured players we would be told to get on with it. So what if 4 or even 5 or 6 players have COVID, we have other players in the squad and the EDS who can play. This sets a very dangerous precedent IMO. What if an important game is coming up and a side has say 3 valuable players out injured or suspended and they know if they cancel the game they would be available for when it was replayed?
Taking my City tinted spectacles away and this is a very poor decision. Not least because of fixture congestion later in the season
Tokyo Blue wrote:nottsblue wrote:Much as I am not disappointed to have to play Everton away just 2 days after our last game, this is wrong IMO.
We have a squad of 25. If we had 10 injured players we would be told to get on with it. So what if 4 or even 5 or 6 players have COVID, we have other players in the squad and the EDS who can play. This sets a very dangerous precedent IMO. What if an important game is coming up and a side has say 3 valuable players out injured or suspended and they know if they cancel the game they would be available for when it was replayed?
Taking my City tinted spectacles away and this is a very poor decision. Not least because of fixture congestion later in the season
Apparently it has been done on medical advice and neither club had a great deal of choice about it.
The same people from the merseyside area whining in their fucking loathsome high-pitched shitty-arsed voices that we should forfeit the game presumably said the same about Newcastle three weeks ago. No? Funny that.
city72 wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:nottsblue wrote:Much as I am not disappointed to have to play Everton away just 2 days after our last game, this is wrong IMO.
We have a squad of 25. If we had 10 injured players we would be told to get on with it. So what if 4 or even 5 or 6 players have COVID, we have other players in the squad and the EDS who can play. This sets a very dangerous precedent IMO. What if an important game is coming up and a side has say 3 valuable players out injured or suspended and they know if they cancel the game they would be available for when it was replayed?
Taking my City tinted spectacles away and this is a very poor decision. Not least because of fixture congestion later in the season
Apparently it has been done on medical advice and neither club had a great deal of choice about it.
The same people from the merseyside area whining in their fucking loathsome high-pitched shitty-arsed voices that we should forfeit the game presumably said the same about Newcastle three weeks ago. No? Funny that.
Do footballers have to self isolate for 10 days like the rest of the population after being in contact with someone who has tested positive?
city72 wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:nottsblue wrote:Much as I am not disappointed to have to play Everton away just 2 days after our last game, this is wrong IMO.
We have a squad of 25. If we had 10 injured players we would be told to get on with it. So what if 4 or even 5 or 6 players have COVID, we have other players in the squad and the EDS who can play. This sets a very dangerous precedent IMO. What if an important game is coming up and a side has say 3 valuable players out injured or suspended and they know if they cancel the game they would be available for when it was replayed?
Taking my City tinted spectacles away and this is a very poor decision. Not least because of fixture congestion later in the season
Apparently it has been done on medical advice and neither club had a great deal of choice about it.
The same people from the merseyside area whining in their fucking loathsome high-pitched shitty-arsed voices that we should forfeit the game presumably said the same about Newcastle three weeks ago. No? Funny that.
Do footballers have to self isolate for 10 days like the rest of the population after being in contact with someone who has tested positive?
nottsblue wrote:Much as I am not disappointed to have to play Everton away just 2 days after our last game, this is wrong IMO.
We have a squad of 25. If we had 10 injured players we would be told to get on with it. So what if 4 or even 5 or 6 players have COVID, we have other players in the squad and the EDS who can play. This sets a very dangerous precedent IMO. What if an important game is coming up and a side has say 3 valuable players out injured or suspended and they know if they cancel the game they would be available for when it was replayed?
Taking my City tinted spectacles away and this is a very poor decision. Not least because of fixture congestion later in the season
blues2win wrote:Times say three more positive cases all of them players. I hope none of them get a bad dose.
Everton wanted precise reasons for postponement. Surely the entire squad has to be in quarantine, not least to safeguard Everton players. A negative test isn’t sufficient to guarantee safe exposure.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mase, Vantage and 164 guests