Harry Kane Not Welcome Here

[nottsblue]

rumours of lewandowski wanting a "new challenge" mean haaland to bayern is nailed on, unfortunately.

Lewandowski back to Dortmund as part of the deal to take Haaland to Bayern.
They will probably try to include Sane on that as well to sweeten the deal

[sheblue]

Why would Haaland want to go to Bayern. No challenge for him there. He has more of a connection with us than Bayern.

[johnny crossan]

Why would Haaland want to go to Bayern. No challenge for him there. He has more of a connection with us than Bayern.

NOT

[sheblue]

Why would Haaland want to go to Bayern. No challenge for him there. He has more of a connection with us than Bayern.

NOT

We've plenty to go around as well....

[Dimples]

Why would Haaland want to go to Bayern. No challenge for him there. He has more of a connection with us than Bayern.

NOT

We've plenty to go around as well....

Haaland would play with Bayern because the German league is so competitve and challenging. The fans own the majority stake in their football clubs so one club can dominate. Otherwise clubs like Bayern Munich would dominate.

Initially the PL was like that to. Very competitive. The Rags only won 8 out of the first 11 titles (on a shoe string budget, they had a great manager to compensate). Then money took over, clubs with no history bought success. Thankfully, there is the odd breakthrough. Plucky little Liverpool broke the monopoly a couple of seasons ago.

[patrickblue]

Why would Haaland want to go to Bayern. No challenge for him there. He has more of a connection with us than Bayern.

NOT

We've plenty to go around as well....

Haaland would play with Bayern because the German league is so competitve and challenging. The fans own the majority stake in their football clubs so one club can dominate. Otherwise clubs like Bayern Munich would dominate.

Initially the PL was like that to. Very competitive. The Rags only won 8 out of the first 11 titles (on a shoe string budget, they had a great manager to compensate). Then money took over, clubs with no history bought success. Thankfully, there is the odd breakthrough. Plucky little Liverpool broke the monopoly a couple of seasons ago.

You should get a job at the fail or mirror.
They'd love you and sarcasm would never occur to them.

[City64]

Apparently that sly gobshite Kaveh Sollylolly or whatever his name is off Sky Sports transfer bollocks has said Kane is 100 % leaving Spurs

Apparently…….

[Dubciteh]

It wont happen now. I hope we have a back up.

[Dimples]

Apparently that sly gobshite Kaveh Sollylolly or whatever his name is off Sky Sports transfer bollocks has said Kane is 100 % leaving Spurs

Apparently…….

The bookies disagree. Odds shortening on Kane staying at Spurs.
So if you follow the money then Kaveh is talking rubbish.

[sheblue]

Ok MCFC who is the alternative?

[aaron bond]

If we end up without a striker by the end of this transfer window then the club really needs to look at what went wrong this summer.

We started the summer with left back and striker the glaring holes in our squad and instead we’ve smashed the British transfer record on an attacking midfielder who is very good, but we didn’t actually need.

Spurs always valued Kane at £150m+ so I’m not sure why we thought we could get him for significantly less. Plus we didn’t help ourselves by spending £100m on Grealish when it’s fair to say Kane is the better player. We were never going to get Kane for a similar price to Grealish.

[carl_feedthegoat]

If we end up without a striker by the end of this transfer window then the club really needs to look at what went wrong this summer.

We started the summer with left back and striker the glaring holes in our squad and instead we’ve smashed the British transfer record on an attacking midfielder who is very good, but we didn’t actually need.

Spurs always valued Kane at £150m+ so I’m not sure why we thought we could get him for significantly less. Plus we didn’t help ourselves by spending £100m on Grealish when it’s fair to say Kane is the better player. We were never going to get Kane for a similar price to Grealish.

We have just repeated history haven’t we .
We signed Mahrez back when that position wasn’t needed (still isn’t needed) and now we signed Grealish when we don’t need that position either - Both are great players but
why on earth baldie thinks that the left back situation and an Agüero replacement isn’t priority over Grealish , only he will know .

[salford city]

If we end up without a striker by the end of this transfer window then the club really needs to look at what went wrong this summer.

We started the summer with left back and striker the glaring holes in our squad and instead we’ve smashed the British transfer record on an attacking midfielder who is very good, but we didn’t actually need.

Spurs always valued Kane at £150m+ so I’m not sure why we thought we could get him for significantly less. Plus we didn’t help ourselves by spending £100m on Grealish when it’s fair to say Kane is the better player. We were never going to get Kane for a similar price to Grealish.

We have just repeated history haven’t we .
We signed Mahrez back when that position wasn’t needed (still isn’t needed) and now we signed Grealish when we don’t need that position either - Both are great players but
why on earth baldie thinks that the left back situation and an Agüero replacement isn’t priority over Grealish , only he will know .

I'm hoping it is because we have Haaland. Only us and Munich in the race for him so thinking that Grealish, whilst not a necessity, Pep wanted him to fill up a false no.9 with the abundance of midfield talent until January and then the kid comes in. Cannot believe that we would have all our eggs in the Kane basket as surely to fuck we were aware of the price from the outset and would not be trying to call their bluff as clearly, they don't need to sell.

[Hazy2]

If we end up without a striker by the end of this transfer window then the club really needs to look at what went wrong this summer.

We started the summer with left back and striker the glaring holes in our squad and instead we’ve smashed the British transfer record on an attacking midfielder who is very good, but we didn’t actually need.

Spurs always valued Kane at £150m+ so I’m not sure why we thought we could get him for significantly less. Plus we didn’t help ourselves by spending £100m on Grealish when it’s fair to say Kane is the better player. We were never going to get Kane for a similar price to Grealish.

We have just repeated history haven’t we .
We signed Mahrez back when that position wasn’t needed (still isn’t needed) and now we signed Grealish when we don’t need that position either - Both are great players but
why on earth baldie thinks that the left back situation and an Agüero replacement isn’t priority over Grealish , only he will know .

The LB I agree on. The 9 we are dealing with Spurs ! Do PSG need Messi. Scum are still not dealing with CM I’d issues. Chelsea are going long ball, it’s the Final week of the window let’s see what it brings.

[Dimples]

If we end up without a striker by the end of this transfer window then the club really needs to look at what went wrong this summer.

We started the summer with left back and striker the glaring holes in our squad and instead we’ve smashed the British transfer record on an attacking midfielder who is very good, but we didn’t actually need.

Spurs always valued Kane at £150m+ so I’m not sure why we thought we could get him for significantly less. Plus we didn’t help ourselves by spending £100m on Grealish when it’s fair to say Kane is the better player. We were never going to get Kane for a similar price to Grealish.

We have just repeated history haven’t we .
We signed Mahrez back when that position wasn’t needed (still isn’t needed) and now we signed Grealish when we don’t need that position either - Both are great players but
why on earth baldie thinks that the left back situation and an Agüero replacement isn’t priority over Grealish , only he will know .

The LB I agree on. The 9 we are dealing with Spurs ! Do PSG need Messi. Scum are still not dealing with CM I’d issues. Chelsea are going long ball, it’s the Final week of the window let’s see what it brings.

If we had Haaland lined up we would have dropped our interest in Kane?
If we had a plan B we would have dropped our interest in Kane ( and the target would have emerged by now)?
Levy, surprise surprise, is digging in and Kane will not take him on, head to head.
This whole saga looks like a massive miscalculation by US and Kane.
For whatever reason we thought we could get Kane, Kane thought he could force Levy to let him go (without a brawl - silly boy) but it is looking like US and Kane are wrong.

If we don't get him this is a shambles and we still have Mendy! Think about that.

[Nickyboy]

Maybe we're not that interested in Kane and its all a smokescreen whilst we tie up Haaland deal for January.

[sheblue]

Maybe we're not that interested in Kane and its all a smokescreen whilst we tie up Haaland deal for January.

Why would we bother, where is the benefit in doing that?

[PeterParker]

Maybe we're not that interested in Kane and its all a smokescreen whilst we tie up Haaland deal for January.

Why would we bother, where is the benefit in doing that?

Our manager refused to understand and accept Mendy is a lump of shit and still uses him because of his stubbornness. As long as he will be here, we are not doing any deals with Raiola. Even if he gives us his best player for 1 pound.

Haaland is not coming.

[PeterParker]

Also, at this point might I dare we are better off?
Kane is a coward.

[kennyboy]

Rags will snap him up for more than we will bid.. Hope it goes as bad as the Sanchez deal.