johnny crossan wrote:£13.6m and he was better than Cucarella - had a good game actuallyMase wrote:s1ty m wrote:KinkyKinkladze wrote:Fucking Gomez hahaha
He's miles off it, sadly. Miles away. Shouldn't be playing for City, no way.
He’s terrible. There’s a reason he cost £1.36 The fact we have a kid that’s learnt our system and tactics that’s already better than Gomez but we refuse to play him over Gomez is disgraceful.
Their two best chances came from Gomez. 12 minutes in he fails to stop the cross and they would have scored if not for Ortega. 62 minutes in he gets nutmegged and turned (school boy stuff) and they have a great chance that Ortega again saves.