by Swales4ever » Thu Sep 24, 2026 2:09 pm
salford city wrote:Swales4ever wrote:salford city wrote:Swales4ever wrote:Nick wrote:My question isnt will enzo play enzo.
Question is does enzo get into our best 11 currently. Im not sure.
Me neither.
Is he better than Enzo? Yes. Can we rely on both to track back and cover against top opposition - No.
Would we all be happy with a season of we will play both and in 'most' games outscore the opposition and get a couple of dickings in the bigger games - particularly the latter stages of chumps league - don't think we would. Be entertaining though!
My main point is that IF/WHEN we start Bouaddi and Anderson, the set up will result as solid and strong as to afford anyone on the 3 creative roles behind the Viking (particularly if/when Maresca will see the light on the Diaz issue)
I get that but if we stick with four at the back, in your setup (mine too), eventually, that still only leaves one no.10 as Enzo is set on two wingers. Yes, Cherki could drop wide but I don't see that in Enzo's'ideal' formation.
Right. And don't you think that's enough firepower (rethorical question)?
I mean, let's not underestimate the pivotal importance of Bouaddi, whose natural ability to see the game and always be in the right place at the right time would allow Anderson to be more box to box involved in the attacking face. Afterall, Maresca original tactics is all about open up spaces for the midfielders/playmakers to get into the box.
Also (theoretically) we have in O'Reilly and Nunes not exactly 2 FBs from the 60s.
1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City
You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...
In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!