IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cityfan wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:He's not fast but he has been getting up & down the pitch pretty well for Villa, particularly in away games, where he's one of the reasons Villa were so successful imo.
I don't think Milner has the kind of electric acceleration that some wingers have to beat their man like Lennon and Walcott. He was though a schoolboy district 100m champion, he has the kind of speed and energy to support an attack quickly as a box to box midfielder.
Not sure if bidding much higher than we are, when we are trying to avoid being seen as a club that can be taken for a financial ride makes much sense though.
We can all give our opinions on what we think of Milner & his price but it counts for nothing. It's Mancini's decision, not us bunch of amateur tacticians & armchair managers on here. Milner is worth whatever price Mancini puts on him. If he's reached that point now then we move on, if not we up the bid. If Mancini's plan for next season & the future has Milner as an integral part then we can haggle as much as we want for now, but if it doesn't work, we pay the fee even if we don't like it.
No point in people on here putting their own price on him because of what they think he can or can't do, it's how much Mancini thinks we need him that's important. If he's essential; we buy him.
So long as it's not 30 mil
I've heard we've got him for £29,999999.99 so everyone's happy.