Guy Debord wrote:He can certainly give commentators a moment...
[youtube]rNADBBe1yNU[/youtube]
Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
mcfc1632 wrote:Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
...well - could be that clubs like Blackburn, Bolton and quite a few others cannot afford to nurture talent - just need a capability to quickly join 1st team squad - whereas clubs like ourselves can afford that investment and have the set up - just thinking
Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
Burt wrote:Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
I thought I read on here a few days ago that he didn't turn up for the trial at Blackburn. Not surprising when you look at how shite they are really and he found out we were interested.
mcfc1632 wrote:Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
...well - could be that clubs like Blackburn, Bolton and quite a few others cannot afford to nurture talent - just need a capability to quickly join 1st team squad - whereas clubs like ourselves can afford that investment and have the set up - just thinking
Dameerto wrote:I'm still curious to know why the contract was cancelled 'by mutual consent' though.
2010-2011 season
On August 4 2010 it was published that Manchester City F.C. decided to sign Assulin [14] although no official announcement has yet been made.
Beefymcfc wrote:From Wiki, for what it's worth:2010-2011 season
On August 4 2010 it was published that Manchester City F.C. decided to sign Assulin [14] although no official announcement has yet been made.
Strange though, Andy (my Stokie mate) said that he was going on trial to them after we'd turned him down?
Ted Hughes wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:From Wiki, for what it's worth:2010-2011 season
On August 4 2010 it was published that Manchester City F.C. decided to sign Assulin [14] although no official announcement has yet been made.
Strange though, Andy (my Stokie mate) said that he was going on trial to them after we'd turned him down?
If his agent has ever seen Stoke play, that's got to be a non starter.
Manx Blue wrote:Burt wrote:Manx Blue wrote:Why would we want a player which Blackburn didn't want? I'm sure fat Sam just had him on a 10 day trial up there... Seen it on SSN whilst I was off... New Leo messi blah blah
I thought I read on here a few days ago that he didn't turn up for the trial at Blackburn. Not surprising when you look at how shite they are really and he found out we were interested.
Fair do's Burt....with my wife having the Baby I've missed out on a few bits lately!
Blue Blood wrote:Dameerto wrote:I'm still curious to know why the contract was cancelled 'by mutual consent' though.
Xavi, Iniesta, Fabragas, Busquets... he could be a world class young talent but even if he is, nudging these guys out a team is gonna be nigh on impossible.
He probably wanted to try his hand breaking into a slightly weaker mid elsewhere.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, city72, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Nigels Tackle, PeterParker, salford city and 255 guests