Mancini (The Ted Hughes and BBS thread)

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Mancini

Postby gaudy » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:31 pm

is ya ya toure carrying a knock/unfit/doesnt give a f**K/just plain lazy/just not any good.or all 5?
User avatar
gaudy
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:18 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby HeyMark » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:33 pm

gaudy wrote:is ya ya toure carrying a knock/unfit/doesnt give a f**K/just plain lazy/just not any good.or all 5?


You gotta admit though when he goes on those runs its sure fun to watch
HeyMark
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:02 pm
Location: Belfast

Re: Mancini

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:40 pm

A point against either Chelsea or the scum is a decent point at anytime.It was achieved with no ambition whatsoever but I have to believe that will come in time as we grow as a team.I don't think Tevez was very close to 100% fit and with no Mario, Mancini decided on the ultra cautious approach and we got a point. Now for 3 more on Saturday.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby Beeks » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:41 pm

Totally negative tactics tonight.. Don't know if he was playing for the draw but it seemed that way..they were there for the fucking taking and we bottled it
Image
User avatar
Beeks
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7545
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Leigh/South Stand 116
Supporter of: The Sky Blues
My favourite player is: Fernandinho

Re: Mancini

Postby HeyMark » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:44 pm

IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Totally negative tactics tonight.. Don't know if he was playing for the draw but it seemed that way..they were there for the fucking taking and we bottled it


I'm pissed off at how negative we were but this 'they were there for the taking' is complete crap. They were well organised and played well, even us playing good attacking football they would have been hard to break down.
HeyMark
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:02 pm
Location: Belfast

Re: Mancini

Postby gaudy » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:46 pm

HeyMark wrote:
gaudy wrote:is ya ya toure carrying a knock/unfit/doesnt give a f**K/just plain lazy/just not any good.or all 5?


You gotta admit though when he goes on those runs its sure fun to watch


have to watch thru my hands,its like he was never taught how to run as a kid.
User avatar
gaudy
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:18 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby john68 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:54 pm

The fact that he chooses to play Yaya up front rather than Adebayor says a lot about Ade's future with us.
I would have taken Yaya off, he was adding nothing to the game. By playing him where he did. it meant that they had the extra man in midfield. Yaya as our extra man didn't pose enough threat in the game to make him a danger.
Milner is far more mobil, which is what we needed.
When he brought Johnno on, Milner should have dropped into the middle and Yaya should have gone for a sit down.


Hopefully when we buy a new striker, Mancini will allow 2 strikers and Silva to drop in behind as the creative general.

Very frustrated by this negative stuff.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Mancini

Postby Blue Since 76 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:54 pm

How are some of you pleased with that? It was back to the worst of the Pearce days, but at least then we had the excuse that we were skint.

Now I know what they mean when they saw money can't buy happiness.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby Beeks » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:15 pm

HeyMark wrote: even us playing good attacking football they would have been hard to break down.


Well we will never know now will we? Because we didn't fucking play good attacking football
Image
User avatar
Beeks
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7545
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Leigh/South Stand 116
Supporter of: The Sky Blues
My favourite player is: Fernandinho

Re: Mancini

Postby 9secondlegend » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:21 pm

i think the thing is he is trying to play this italian style football.
defend deep and attack on the break , every single game we have played this season we have done this somtimes to good effect but when its not working he cant change the game round.
i obviousley know far less about football than our manager but united were there for the taking.and i bit more positive football should have easily been enough to beat a very weak united team. imo.
against birmingham he needs to decide about his midfield and just choose 2 out of barry ,de jong , yaya. personaly i would start with the 1st 2 and aj and silva either side of them
9secondlegend
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: MANCHESTER
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: Mancini

Postby Dronny » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:22 pm

A point away at the swamp playing like that and you'd take it, not convinced at all by the way we played. Too many gaps between our midfield and forwards therefore we carried no threat going forward "en masse".

Disappointing....2pts dropped
Image
User avatar
Dronny
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3965
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 10:08 am
Location: On my arse at my pc
Supporter of: The one and only
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: Mancini

Postby john68 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:27 pm

Under normal circumstances I would be happy to agree with that Dronny mate but if we play at the swamp against a rag teram that is there for the taking, I would expect us to go and take them. If we tried but got a draw, I'd be satisfied. If we failed to try and got a draw, I'd feel as frustrated as tonight.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Mancini

Postby Beefymcfc » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:28 pm

Even though I thought it was a god-awful game by us, Mancini has actually pulled it out the bag in a way. United gained 3 points from this game last season but now they've lost 2 this and we've gained one. And considering who they've played compared to us, we aren't actually in a bad position.

I've got a feeling that Mancini has planned his season out and set his trajectory according to each game, and sets the team up accordingly. Even if it ain't pretty to watch and the lads could play a more natural game, the points are there for all to see. Four points in front of 5th is more than acceptable at this level, don't you agree?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Mancini

Postby john68 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:37 pm

Et tu beefers?
Yes mate you are factually correct but teams become successful when they take opportunities. The rags have played crap for most of this season but they have taken their opportunities by turning losses into draws and draws into wins. They sit above us.
Tonight we may have gained 1pt from last season but it was a 3pt opportunity lost.

...and it's still all your fault...:-)
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Mancini

Postby Blue Since 76 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:45 pm

his post match comments worry me - i hope he was just talking bollocks to annoy the press.

Cos if he really thinks that was us trying to win the game...

I'm also concerned about his constant comments about 2 games in a few days. Every other team had the same situation this week, so stop bitching. Whilst our squad is the same size as everone else's, there should be more strength in depth. Who else could bring on the equivalent of Johnson, Kolarov and Adebayor?
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby Beefymcfc » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:46 pm

john68 wrote:Et tu beefers?
Yes mate you are factually correct but teams become successful when they take opportunities. The rags have played crap for most of this season but they have taken their opportunities by turning losses into draws and draws into wins. They sit above us.
Tonight we may have gained 1pt from last season but it was a 3pt opportunity lost.

...and it's still all your fault...:-)

I'm trying to find some positives tonight mate, give me a break ;-)

PS. We've got 78 points to play for, surely one performance doesn't end our season (just seen your post ;-)).
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Mancini

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:14 am

john68 wrote:The fact that he chooses to play Yaya up front rather than Adebayor says a lot about Ade's future with us.
I would have taken Yaya off, he was adding nothing to the game. By playing him where he did. it meant that they had the extra man in midfield. Yaya as our extra man didn't pose enough threat in the game to make him a danger.
Milner is far more mobil, which is what we needed.
When he brought Johnno on, Milner should have dropped into the middle and Yaya should have gone for a sit down.


Hopefully when we buy a new striker, Mancini will allow 2 strikers and Silva to drop in behind as the creative general.

Very frustrated by this negative stuff.


Yaya was partly there to dilute the influence of Scholes imo by making him track back & it worked to a large extent as Scholes produced fewer dangerous passes in this game than just about any game I've seen him play in recent years. As Doug said, in a way it's a decent point. The rags defended really well tonight & did the moving accross as a block thing that Mancini has been trying to teach City, far better than we currently do. They've had much more practice though.

My gripe is that we once again unbalanced the team by playing Boateng, who was clearly shitting himself & scared to attack & we waited til injury time to bring on Ade for a clearly unfit Tevez, purely to waste time rather than go for a win. Having to settle for a point is one thing but playing for a draw, as Bob has in every derby, even the cup games, is totally unacceptable imo.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Mancini

Postby Beefymcfc » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:38 am

Ted Hughes wrote:
john68 wrote:The fact that he chooses to play Yaya up front rather than Adebayor says a lot about Ade's future with us.
I would have taken Yaya off, he was adding nothing to the game. By playing him where he did. it meant that they had the extra man in midfield. Yaya as our extra man didn't pose enough threat in the game to make him a danger.
Milner is far more mobil, which is what we needed.
When he brought Johnno on, Milner should have dropped into the middle and Yaya should have gone for a sit down.


Hopefully when we buy a new striker, Mancini will allow 2 strikers and Silva to drop in behind as the creative general.

Very frustrated by this negative stuff.


Yaya was partly there to dilute the influence of Scholes imo by making him track back & it worked to a large extent as Scholes produced fewer dangerous passes in this game than just about any game I've seen him play in recent years. As Doug said, in a way it's a decent point. The rags defended really well tonight & did the moving accross as a block thing that Mancini has been trying to teach City, far better than we currently do. They've had much more practice though.

My gripe is that we once again unbalanced the team by playing Boateng, who was clearly shitting himself & scared to attack & we waited til injury time to bring on Ade for a clearly unfit Tevez, purely to waste time rather than go for a win. Having to settle for a point is one thing but playing for a draw, as Bob has in every derby, even the cup games, is totally unacceptable imo.

I was keeping an eye on Scholes tonight and fromwhat I saw he was either suffering from that 'Virus' or he is just getting old. After 20 or so minutes he kept looking down at his boots after making a pass, Vidic was similar, which suggested to me that he was knackered as usually he'd be moving on for the next phase.

Just an observation.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Mancini

Postby petrov » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:42 am

We've drawn with the most consistent side in the league, a team thats unbeaten. They played crap against everyone else and won, played well against us and couldnt beat us and people are still moaning. Its not like a home draw against Rochdale. Way too much whinging round here. It was a good result, we defended brilliantly and we contained a United team who were kicking into gear.

Good performance and a good result. Thinking we should take the game to United and we have a better team is crazy. We've played the entire big 4 now with Mancini's negative tactics. we've trounced Liverpool, beat Chelsea, drew with United and lost 3-0 to Arsenal in a game which could of went either way had our young centre back not being foolish. Thats 7 points from a possible 12 against the top 4. By my reckoning thats not too shabby.
petrov
Tevez's Golfing Holiday
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 4:48 pm

Re: Mancini

Postby john68 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:44 am

Good point that Ted and one I hadn't thought about.

As another positive thought beefy...How about the fact that having played the rags and got a draw, most of feel disappointed.
It isn't that long ago that we often felt relieved that derbies were over.
It is a measure, not only of their failings but also our rise that this perception has changed.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stan and 82 guests