LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:I'm making this post.
It contains a lot of made up shit that I've drawn my own conclusions on and has very little to do with the rest of the thread.
I've possibly read two or the lines of the odd post and seen what I want to see.
Now this is my inaccurate summary.
I'm closing with an irrelevant reference to the past.
Arjan Van Schotte wrote:I'm starting to get quite annoyed now.... :)
the games's on telly, it's at 6pm, we're 2-0 down, and we'll still get more than we used to for a home league game just a few years ago.
We took 400 to a winnable league cup tie at plymouth in the league cup in the late 80's where were the gloryhunters then?
leave out the billy big balls nonsense or we'll start to sound like chelsea (avg attendance 15 years ago 21K - man city avg attendance that year 22K.) PS - Sheff Wed avg. att. that year 27K. Get off yer high horse.
Ted Hughes wrote:
It's a bigger game than most home league games from a few years ago. One of the most disappointing things about it, is that people don't realise it.
Arjan Van Schotte wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
It's a bigger game than most home league games from a few years ago. One of the most disappointing things about it, is that people don't realise it.
i completely agree ted - but that would ignore the fact that things have changed and the league (and season "card" holders) are far more important now. it's not just us you know.
john68 wrote:I am amazed at the attitude of some City fans.
It seems that some won't be there because we are 2-0 down and don't consider that attemppting to win a European trophy is woeth the bother.
There seems to be a brand new breed of fan these days, who act more like customers than supporters. Turn up for the big games to see what City will give them...Cummon City, entertain me and give me my moneysworth.
I always belived that it was the duty of the supporter to get behind the team and drive them on to greater efforts and success. Cheer the team through the bad times and lift them to perform.
Ted Hughes wrote:LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:I'm making this post.
It contains a lot of made up shit that I've drawn my own conclusions on and has very little to do with the rest of the thread.
I've possibly read two or the lines of the odd post and seen what I want to see.
Now this is my inaccurate summary.
I'm closing with an irrelevant reference to the past.
Ugh. Horrible smarmy post.
mcfc1632 wrote:john68 wrote:I am amazed at the attitude of some City fans.
It seems that some won't be there because we are 2-0 down and don't consider that attemppting to win a European trophy is woeth the bother.
There seems to be a brand new breed of fan these days, who act more like customers than supporters. Turn up for the big games to see what City will give them...Cummon City, entertain me and give me my moneysworth.
I always belived that it was the duty of the supporter to get behind the team and drive them on to greater efforts and success. Cheer the team through the bad times and lift them to perform.
I am with you John - it just blows me away that we can attract more for our home games in div 1 of 1998 than we can in an FA cup or Europa cup game in 2011 - we must be part of an old breed - just cannot understand it.
I thought the earlier comment about the fact that there will be lots of blues watching the game in the pub and spending more than the cost of going is an insight - people have changed - maybe it is the availability of media to provide live coverage - it is not just us many many clubs across Europe have half empty stadiums on a regular basis - I just thought / hoped we were better supported than that
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:I'm making this post.
It contains a lot of made up shit that I've drawn my own conclusions on and has very little to do with the rest of the thread.
I've possibly read two or the lines of the odd post and seen what I want to see.
Now this is my inaccurate summary.
I'm closing with an irrelevant reference to the past.
Ugh. Horrible smarmy post.
Who cares?! You try and give a reasonable answer and people call you smarmy and avoid your whole argument. May as well be smarmy and ignore all the relevant posts being made.
john68 wrote:Sorry Arjan, I didn't make that clear...my bad.
It wasn't a dig at the crowd levels...though I have never understood why we have always tended to have significanlty lower crowds for European games than the bread and butter league games. Personally I have always thought that the Euro games were a touch more exotic.
But...for a group of fans who have been so starved of success and European competition, over so many years, it absolutely baffles me that we can't, seemingly generate enough enthusiasm to draw a much better response from our supporters.
john68 wrote:
My dig was aimed at the attitude of the fans and how they respond to events on the pitch. If things are going well, it can be a laugh a minute, Poznans galore and the good old City humour, as we saw towards the end of the reading game. When things are going badly, City fans tend to remain pretty quiet. Gone are the days when the fans pulled their tripes out to generate an atmosphere to drive the team on. At one time, if we conceded a goal, the 1st chant you ever heard was a deafening response of C-I-T-Y.
Maybe...chicken and egg Mate...Do they lift us?...or do we lift them?
john68 wrote:I am amazed at the attitude of some City fans.
It seems that some won't be there because we are 2-0 down and don't consider that attemppting to win a European trophy is woeth the bother.
There seems to be a brand new breed of fan these days, who act more like customers than supporters. Turn up for the big games to see what City will give them...Cummon City, entertain me and give me my moneysworth.
I always belived that it was the duty of the supporter to get behind the team and drive them on to greater efforts and success. Cheer the team through the bad times and lift them to perform.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Google [Bot] and 245 guests