by john68 » Sun May 22, 2011 5:28 am
It is fine for us to say we are above this shit, it shows how bitter they are and how obsessed they are about us. It is fine to say that we should focus on City and ignore their continued jibes at us. It is also fine to consider it all a bit vulgar, juvenile and sad and consider we are above that sort of thing.
But, we should remember that like it or not, we are now a football brand that is competing with them on the World stage and in the World's marketplace. To allow this to continue, to allow them to publically ridicule us, is also to allow them to diminish our brand.
We know better. we know that it took them all those years between trophies but do they ? Does the media? Do the potential City fans who our club are seeking to attract? That is why it was necessary to have it removed.
That banner did damage us. Like advertisding, the world's media saw it and believed it. It allowed the world's/rag's media to cement the perception that they were great and we were just a litlle shit outfit that had no history and no chance of success. It gave the football/rag media a tool to batter us with.
If you don't agree, then ask yourself this. After we won the cup... Why was the 35 years mentioned in every news bulletin, every headline, every story about ur victory? Why did the media find it so important to make sure that everyone was aware of our 35 years of failure. Advertising works and that banner did its job. It started as a humourous jibe by an idiot who knew no better...it became a instrument with which the rag media ridiculed us.
Should we ignore it? LIKE FUCK WE SHOULD.
THE CITY IS OURS campaign was in response to the survey proving City fans' ascendancy in the City of Manchester.
THE WELCOME TO MANCHESTER poster was to emphasise we alone play in Manchester.
THE ZERO YEARS BANNER AT WEMBLEY wasn't just a response to the rags stupid banner, it was also a major statement by the club that we had arrived.
If you simply walk away from the school bully, it is interpreted as fear.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT