Goaters 103 wrote:The whole operation is rotten to the core. All turds floating in the same river; anything that sees Blatter come under scrutiny and cause him any concern wiping that smug smile off his face, has to be good.
After snubbing England, USA, Spain and Australia in the last bidding process, and taking any bribes on offer, they made some powerful enemies who will do everything they can to bring Blatter and his cronies down. Lets hope thats what happens though I won't hold my breath.
Goaters 103 wrote:The whole operation is rotten to the core. All turds floating in the same river; anything that sees Blatter come under scrutiny and cause him any concern wiping that smug smile off his face, has to be good.
After snubbing England, USA, Spain and Australia in the last bidding process, and taking any bribes on offer, they made some powerful enemies who will do everything they can to bring Blatter and his cronies down. Lets hope thats what happens though I won't hold my breath.
lets all have a disco wrote:It might be rotten to the core but it's fucking hard to turn down free hotels,cars,holidays,free women and free money.
Regardless of what people say i'd struggle.
Stan wrote:Goaters 103 wrote:The whole operation is rotten to the core. All turds floating in the same river; anything that sees Blatter come under scrutiny and cause him any concern wiping that smug smile off his face, has to be good.
After snubbing England, USA, Spain and Australia in the last bidding process, and taking any bribes on offer, they made some powerful enemies who will do everything they can to bring Blatter and his cronies down. Lets hope thats what happens though I won't hold my breath.
Is the English FA (pre-Bernstein) not also a bit shady though? Triesman's only recently (since the England bid failed) been raising allegations of improper and unethical behaviour during the bidding processagainst various FIFA punters . Why didn't he raise these allegations at the time they occurred (specially if he rejected the advances) raather than wait? and didn't the FA arrange a friendly against Thailand, or somewhere, to try and influence (allegedly) voting and then withdrew the game when it didn't work?
Nigels Tackle wrote:what right does fifa have to govern world football??
surely it would not be difficult for the major country fa's to break away and set up a new global organisation??
Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Nigels Tackle wrote:what right does fifa have to govern world football??
surely it would not be difficult for the major country fa's to break away and set up a new global organisation??
CityGer wrote:I'm convinced that the next major issue they'll face is a number of large law suits from the associations whose bids for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments were unsuccessful.
They're no longer in a position to even keep a straight face if pushed on whether the bidding process was fair and there are some very powerful countries whose authorities spent huge sums on money on bids which were doomed to fail before they even got off the ground. They will quite rightly want their tens of millions pounds back.
I will make great news and I'm looking forward to it.
Alioune DVToure wrote:Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Elliot Ness and his men were the 'untouchables' - NOT Al Capone and the like. They were given this name because they couldn't be bought off by gangs - they were 'untouchable' in that they were upstanding and incorruptible.
This has to be one of the biggest misunderstandings in modern history. I reckon I've explained this myself about 15 times over the last five years or so.
Dr. Dre has to be one of the few people on earth to actually get it the right way round. His nifty 'let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west / the state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness' rhyme in 'California Love' actually made correct use of the term.
Nothing to do with the thread like, but I thought you might benefit from having that cleared up :)
Alioune DVToure wrote:Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Elliot Ness and his men were the 'untouchables' - NOT Al Capone and the like. They were given this name because they couldn't be bought off by gangs - they were 'untouchable' in that they were upstanding and incorruptible.
This has to be one of the biggest misunderstandings in modern history. I reckon I've explained this myself about 15 times over the last five years or so.
Dr. Dre has to be one of the few people on earth to actually get it the right way round. His nifty 'let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west / the state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness' rhyme in 'California Love' actually made correct use of the term.
Nothing to do with the thread like, but I thought you might benefit from having that cleared up :)
DoomMerchant wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Elliot Ness and his men were the 'untouchables' - NOT Al Capone and the like. They were given this name because they couldn't be bought off by gangs - they were 'untouchable' in that they were upstanding and incorruptible.
This has to be one of the biggest misunderstandings in modern history. I reckon I've explained this myself about 15 times over the last five years or so.
Dr. Dre has to be one of the few people on earth to actually get it the right way round. His nifty 'let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west / the state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness' rhyme in 'California Love' actually made correct use of the term.
Nothing to do with the thread like, but I thought you might benefit from having that cleared up :)
thank fuck someone did that.
FIFA is no more or less corrupt than any other governing body would be with so much at stake. Kiers has it right...if everyone knows yr sporting a big huge cock, someone's gonna find a way to put that in their private parts. FACT.
The US and England are just pissed because we couldn't match the corruption-level and win this shit. Sore losers. We should have just changed the game if we were losing. I think we are just a bunch of pussies for losing those bids tbh.
cheers
DoomMerchant wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Elliot Ness and his men were the 'untouchables' - NOT Al Capone and the like. They were given this name because they couldn't be bought off by gangs - they were 'untouchable' in that they were upstanding and incorruptible.
This has to be one of the biggest misunderstandings in modern history. I reckon I've explained this myself about 15 times over the last five years or so.
Dr. Dre has to be one of the few people on earth to actually get it the right way round. His nifty 'let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west / the state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness' rhyme in 'California Love' actually made correct use of the term.
Nothing to do with the thread like, but I thought you might benefit from having that cleared up :)
thank fuck someone did that.
FIFA is no more or less corrupt than any other governing body would be with so much at stake. Kiers has it right...if everyone knows yr sporting a big huge cock, someone's gonna find a way to put that in their private parts. FACT.
The US and England are just pissed because we couldn't match the corruption-level and win this shit. Sore losers. We should have just changed the game if we were losing. I think we are just a bunch of pussies for losing those bids tbh.
cheers
Beefymcfc wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:Beeks wrote:[highlight]They are literally untouchable..there is no Elliott Ness to bring them down like the Mafia[/highlight]
For some reason they seem to operate way above the law
Elliot Ness and his men were the 'untouchables' - NOT Al Capone and the like. They were given this name because they couldn't be bought off by gangs - they were 'untouchable' in that they were upstanding and incorruptible.
This has to be one of the biggest misunderstandings in modern history. I reckon I've explained this myself about 15 times over the last five years or so.
Dr. Dre has to be one of the few people on earth to actually get it the right way round. His nifty 'let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west / the state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness' rhyme in 'California Love' actually made correct use of the term.
Nothing to do with the thread like, but I thought you might benefit from having that cleared up :)
thank fuck someone did that.
FIFA is no more or less corrupt than any other governing body would be with so much at stake. Kiers has it right...if everyone knows yr sporting a big huge cock, someone's gonna find a way to put that in their private parts. FACT.
The US and England are just pissed because we couldn't match the corruption-level and win this shit. Sore losers. We should have just changed the game if we were losing. I think we are just a bunch of pussies for losing those bids tbh.
cheers
I'm thinking you're a pussy for sitting back and taking it up the arse.
Cheers.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Simister and 119 guests