Esky wrote:Good start or not, I'd still be thrilled with top three. As good as Aguero et al all are, there was a lot of turnover in the summer. As long as we maintain and look to full further away from Arsenal/Spurs/Liverpool then I'll be happy. Anything more is a bonus.
Rag_hater wrote:Anything but us getting FIFA to give him a long ban strikes me as a failure on our part.If we move him on in Jan then he has got what he wants.We should try and keep him banned whilst constantly adjourning the case or something that keeps him from playing IMO.I think Bob should keep him there in Manchester where he does not like it for as long as possible.
Terry Cookes nose wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Anything but us getting FIFA to give him a long ban strikes me as a failure on our part.If we move him on in Jan then he has got what he wants.We should try and keep him banned whilst constantly adjourning the case or something that keeps him from playing IMO.I think Bob should keep him there in Manchester where he does not like it for as long as possible.
Fully agree.
Tevez wanted to play it tough. Let's give it to him.
Chinners wrote:Man U dropped 2 points at Stoke
Ted Hughes wrote:I don't understand why people think we did ok v Napoli. Like the Bayern game, it was almost a textbook example of how NOT to play in the Champion's Lg. They had more opportunites to score than Bayern did but wasted them. It was a fucking appalling, naive in fact fucking clueless performance imo & we were lucky to get away with it. On another day, we would have let 4 goals in on the break. Luckily for us, they decided to shoot from 30 yards when in fantastic positions rather than take us to the cleaners as many teams would have done.
Re the Fulham game; if we miss the title by two points, those are the 2 points.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I don't understand why people think we did ok v Napoli. Like the Bayern game, it was almost a textbook example of how NOT to play in the Champion's Lg. They had more opportunites to score than Bayern did but wasted them. It was a fucking appalling, naive in fact fucking clueless performance imo & we were lucky to get away with it. On another day, we would have let 4 goals in on the break. Luckily for us, they decided to shoot from 30 yards when in fantastic positions rather than take us to the cleaners as many teams would have done.
Re the Fulham game; if we miss the title by two points, those are the 2 points.
Whilst I agree our approach to the 2 CL games has been naive I don't think we were as lucky as you make out against Napoli.Yes they could have scored more than one but so could we.I just hope we have learned the lessons and we will find out in the next 2 games which we have to win. A gung ho approach isnt the way to win them though.
As for the Fulham game I am tempted to say it was just one of those games which will inevitably happen but that would be wrong. A 2.2 draw can happen yes,but not in a game against a team like Fulham where we are 2 up and flying. I don't think that will define the season though as I reckon that will be how we fare against the top 6 teams.I want us to pull a surprise out somewhere to cover the 2 points lost at Fulham.
Ted Hughes wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I don't understand why people think we did ok v Napoli. Like the Bayern game, it was almost a textbook example of how NOT to play in the Champion's Lg. They had more opportunites to score than Bayern did but wasted them. It was a fucking appalling, naive in fact fucking clueless performance imo & we were lucky to get away with it. On another day, we would have let 4 goals in on the break. Luckily for us, they decided to shoot from 30 yards when in fantastic positions rather than take us to the cleaners as many teams would have done.
Re the Fulham game; if we miss the title by two points, those are the 2 points.
Whilst I agree our approach to the 2 CL games has been naive I don't think we were as lucky as you make out against Napoli.Yes they could have scored more than one but so could we.I just hope we have learned the lessons and we will find out in the next 2 games which we have to win. A gung ho approach isnt the way to win them though.
As for the Fulham game I am tempted to say it was just one of those games which will inevitably happen but that would be wrong. A 2.2 draw can happen yes,but not in a game against a team like Fulham where we are 2 up and flying. I don't think that will define the season though as I reckon that will be how we fare against the top 6 teams.I want us to pull a surprise out somewhere to cover the 2 points lost at Fulham.
To even it up, either the rags have to draw at Fulham or we have to beat Stoke away. Then, on the head to head, we've got the ponts back. imo though, just matching the rags away total won't do it. If we beat them at OT, we may well be the only team to do so this season; everyone is shit scared of them & even when they have a stinker, teams just miss open goals & let them off the hook. When we have a stinker at home, someone wil beat us. We need to be clearly better than them in away games imo or we come 2nd.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I don't understand why people think we did ok v Napoli. Like the Bayern game, it was almost a textbook example of how NOT to play in the Champion's Lg. They had more opportunites to score than Bayern did but wasted them. It was a fucking appalling, naive in fact fucking clueless performance imo & we were lucky to get away with it. On another day, we would have let 4 goals in on the break. Luckily for us, they decided to shoot from 30 yards when in fantastic positions rather than take us to the cleaners as many teams would have done.
Re the Fulham game; if we miss the title by two points, those are the 2 points.
Whilst I agree our approach to the 2 CL games has been naive I don't think we were as lucky as you make out against Napoli.Yes they could have scored more than one but so could we.I just hope we have learned the lessons and we will find out in the next 2 games which we have to win. A gung ho approach isnt the way to win them though.
As for the Fulham game I am tempted to say it was just one of those games which will inevitably happen but that would be wrong. A 2.2 draw can happen yes,but not in a game against a team like Fulham where we are 2 up and flying. I don't think that will define the season though as I reckon that will be how we fare against the top 6 teams.I want us to pull a surprise out somewhere to cover the 2 points lost at Fulham.
To even it up, either the rags have to draw at Fulham or we have to beat Stoke away. Then, on the head to head, we've got the ponts back. imo though, just matching the rags away total won't do it. If we beat them at OT, we may well be the only team to do so this season; everyone is shit scared of them & even when they have a stinker, teams just miss open goals & let them off the hook. When we have a stinker at home, someone wil beat us. We need to be clearly better than them in away games imo or we come 2nd.
Playing away, we were better last year than them were we not?
This year mate we need to perform home and away.....
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Beanieboy, BlueinBosnia, Google [Bot], lonestay, Nick, PeterParker, salford city and 90 guests