Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Based on the current situation a loss is not so devestating. I mean think about this, we stay +/- 2 points of each other all season the 2012 derby at home would truly be the decider, and I like our odds in that one.
That said, to go 5 points clear of them would be amazing capital, and great fodder for them to furhter expound on how money has ruined football, which is probably a true statement given the fact all their money is what has made them the most successful team since the premier league was created. You Brits really do have a great grasp on irony.
[highlight]For true irony, see: "World Series".[/[/highlight]quote]
Tradition Dameerto, nothing more nothing less. In 1903 it was truly the World Series, would be silly to change it to something like North America Series.
Ah tradition, like the one we have of playing FOOTBALL, I see.
BobbyJ1956 wrote:Five points clear after the weekend or not (and I think City will be) the bigger threat I see is from Chelsea. Sturridge is playing like we knew he could and they have a manager who will get better as he grows into the job, going to be one of the best in Europe.
Florida Blue wrote:Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Based on the current situation a loss is not so devestating. I mean think about this, we stay +/- 2 points of each other all season the 2012 derby at home would truly be the decider, and I like our odds in that one.
That said, to go 5 points clear of them would be amazing capital, and great fodder for them to furhter expound on how money has ruined football, which is probably a true statement given the fact all their money is what has made them the most successful team since the premier league was created. You Brits really do have a great grasp on irony.
[highlight]For true irony, see: "World Series".[/[/highlight]quote]
Tradition Dameerto, nothing more nothing less. In 1903 it was truly the World Series, would be silly to change it to something like North America Series.
Ah tradition, like the one we have of playing FOOTBALL, I see.
Dude, just own it, SOCCER is YOUR term as well. We just chose not to use FOOTBALL. ;)
Florida Blue wrote:Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Dameerto wrote:Florida Blue wrote:Based on the current situation a loss is not so devestating. I mean think about this, we stay +/- 2 points of each other all season the 2012 derby at home would truly be the decider, and I like our odds in that one.
That said, to go 5 points clear of them would be amazing capital, and great fodder for them to furhter expound on how money has ruined football, which is probably a true statement given the fact all their money is what has made them the most successful team since the premier league was created. You Brits really do have a great grasp on irony.
[highlight]For true irony, see: "World Series".[/[/highlight]quote]
Tradition Dameerto, nothing more nothing less. In 1903 it was truly the World Series, would be silly to change it to something like North America Series.
Ah tradition, like the one we have of playing FOOTBALL, I see.
Dude, just own it, SOCCER is YOUR term as well. We just chose not to use FOOTBALL. ;)
Kladze wrote:
I have no objection to Americans using the word football ........ I simply don't understand it. Why would you call a game football when only two players from each team actually ever kick the ball? and relatively rarely too?
Arjan Van Schotte wrote:Kladze wrote:
I have no objection to Americans using the word football ........ I simply don't understand it. Why would you call a game football when only two players from each team actually ever kick the ball? and relatively rarely too?
it's a respectful homage to it's founding - on the football fields of rugby school. but i think you knew that ;-)
Kladze wrote:Arjan Van Schotte wrote:Kladze wrote:
I have no objection to Americans using the word football ........ I simply don't understand it. Why would you call a game football when only two players from each team actually ever kick the ball? and relatively rarely too?
it's a respectful homage to it's founding - on the football fields of rugby school. but i think you knew that ;-)
I did know that when it's applied to Rugby Union/League. Didn't realise it had been made to apply to Gridiron though - fair enough I s'pose.
Sweden wrote:Hart
Richards Kompany Lescott Clichy
Y.Toure de Jong
Aguero Milner Silva
Balotelli
Sweden wrote:Hart
Richards Kompany Lescott Clichy
Y.Toure de Jong
Aguero Milner Silva
Balotelli
london blue 2 wrote:Nani scares me a bit, the cunt. If we can keep him quiet I think we should be comfortable.
Barry should play. Mans been class.
Hart
Richard kompany lescott clichy
De Jong Barry
Silva Toure Aguero
Balonutter
london blue 2 wrote:Nani scares me a bit, the cunt. If we can keep him quiet I think we should be comfortable.
Barry should play. Mans been class.
Hart
Richard kompany lescott clichy
De Jong Barry
Silva Toure Aguero
Balonutter
Arjan Van Schotte wrote:Sweden wrote:Hart
Richards Kompany Lescott Clichy
Y.Toure de Jong
Aguero Milner Silva
Balotelli
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Scatman and 290 guests