Dameerto wrote:It's not all lost though, the club can still show a history of Tevez's reactions to being asked to warm up, (and stress again that the fine was for refusing to WARM UP, not refusal to play) he's been caught on camera several times. Is there any kind of appeal against the PFA for a club? The player certainly gets plenty of protection from 'unjust' decisions so why don't clubs?
CityGer wrote:including Tevez's new 'PR Advisor' Paul McCarthy, he clearly has no shame.
trueblue64 wrote:Manchester City Football Club has received notification from the Players' Union (PFA) that it will not support a four-week fine as a penalty for the actions of misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
The Club acknowledges that the Players' Union is the sole organisation empowered with granting the ability for clubs to levy fines greater than the two weeks provided for in player contracts.
However, Manchester City is disappointed by the apparent PFA conflict of interest evident in this process.
Carlos Tevez has been personally represented throughout by the PFA Chief Executive, on whose considerations the Club has been informed that the PFA has made its decision.
Manchester City has been in constant dialogue with the PFA since September 28th. Today's PFA decision is a departure from the Club's understanding of that dialogue.
Without recourse to the PFA decision available, the maximum two-week fine provided for in standard player contracts will now be applied in relation to the misconduct of Carlos Tevez.
Full club statment....
Patrick wrote:Just to add insult to injury..... We have to play him or he can walk for free.....
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 76786.html
City's attempts to maintain a hard line against Tevez are further undermined by Fifa legislation which means they must play the Argentine in 10 per cent of their games this season or risk giving him the right to terminate his contract and walk away.
Article 15 of Fifa's Regulations on the Status & Transfer of Players stipulates that the striker is entitled to terminate his contract under "sporting just cause" next summer if he has been on the field for less than ten per cent of City's total game time by then.
Im no advocate of violence, but the cuntl needs kneecapping
Patrick wrote:Just to add insult to injury..... We have to play him or he can walk for free.....
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 76786.html
City's attempts to maintain a hard line against Tevez are further undermined by Fifa legislation which means they must play the Argentine in 10 per cent of their games this season or risk giving him the right to terminate his contract and walk away.
Article 15 of Fifa's Regulations on the Status & Transfer of Players stipulates that the striker is entitled to terminate his contract under "sporting just cause" next summer if he has been on the field for less than ten per cent of City's total game time by then.
Im no advocate of violence, but the cuntl needs kneecapping
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee and 226 guests