mr_nool wrote:gillie wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:The Man In Blue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:yet you do
Well if you carry on putting words into my mouth I do eh?
You're about as interesting as Michael Owen's twitter feed Carl. Do try harder or not at all.
I am very interesting and people like me... whereas you are like the snot that dribbles out of a camels nose..slimy runny little fucker that people look away in disgust.
Cue a reposte from MiB.Keep it up lads i'm enjoying the banter.
That last one was quite a weak effort, though. I've seen much worse/better from Carl.
great post from you there agree with it all, its like a war propaganda machine just continuous drivel, journalists like martin samuel who write great articles get ignored fair play one was an example. you might not believe this my son his 22 ive taken him to watch city all over since he turned 8 years old, he came round to mine on sunday to watch the cup match i said before the kick off a city player will get sent off today for nothing he looked at me and i dont think he believed me. why should he, 10 minutes gone there it was unbelievable they cant have city winning a treble especially a domestic one. thats how i feel anyway its corrupt from top to bottom until these sort of things are exposed it will keep happening.Lev Bronstein wrote:When Benitez came out with his rant about how Fergie had the English football world in his back pocket he was loudly and widely derided: laughed out of court.
When Warnock suggests that refs have it in for his team and always favour the big clubs he's dismissed as a moaning obnoxious prat.
When a certain ex player for Utd (whose name I can't remember) said that behind the scenes everyone has to treat the Dear Leader as though he's some tin god and complains about a bullying culture, his remarks are barely reported apart from the context of how wonderful SAF's management style is and how the player isn't worthy to play for such a great club.
When SAF bans reporters who ask "impertinent" questions, like he's some kind of third world dictator, do the media rise up as one to demand freedom of the press? No, if we're lucky we get a 10 minute chuckle on Sunday Supplement, then they move on.
When there's a training ground bust up that gets in the papers, gnarled old pros the land over go on about how it happens in every club. You never hear of many at the rags. Is it because they are uniquely blessed, or because there's a conspiracy of silence, or maybe people are too scared to report what goes on?
I could go on, and many on here could add better examples to my list.
A story has been built up, a narrative if you like. It's one that's helped keep Utd at the top, or at least tries to keep the pecking order in place.
I was in the car listening to the build up to the other semi-final tonight. I don't think I heard Cardiff mentioned once in half an hour. But then, they aren't a London club.
It's not just us. How many times have lesser teams had poor decisions against bigger clubs. A blatent penalty turned down, and then a soft free kick on the half-way line "to even thins up". If it ever happens the other way round the big club fans squeel like pigs.
Referees shouldn't bother with this nonsense, they should give decisions as they see them no matter who plays. Doesn't happen though. A couple of years back Graham Pohl was on the radio and he said that he always hesitated to gave a penalty against Utd at OT.
We are going to have trouble for a few years to come. We aren't yet seen to be an established big club. At the moment we are still treated like lottery winners trying to buy a house in a posh neighbourhood. The existing residents don't like it, and are doing everything to make us feel unwelcome.
It won't work, we are a rising force and we aren't going away.
Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
ashton287 wrote:
No there isn't an all consuming hate for us driving this.
It's that shithole in Salford calling the shots, if sometimes indirectly. They have been built up into this super club that represents English football. There are jobs and money at stake in them falling from the top spot. They are the club they are because certain people decided they will be the poster boys for the premier league. Sky and the other money men behind football.
As far as these people are concerned we can be a big club, aslong as that lot are bigger because they have too much invested in them.
It's not far fetched to believe when sky got involved with the prem/created the prem they needed a poster boy, they needed someone they could Market on a worldwide scale so they picked a team. Then they pushed a few people into supporting the rise of the scum.
For the record pre sky they had won 7 league titles in-between 1876-1967, post sky it is 12 in 20. They hadn't won a league title in 20 odd years before sky came along and we all know how they won the first one. By cheating. Sky created them and sky run football FACT.
Original Dub wrote:ashton287 wrote:
No there isn't an all consuming hate for us driving this.
It's that shithole in Salford calling the shots, if sometimes indirectly. They have been built up into this super club that represents English football. There are jobs and money at stake in them falling from the top spot. They are the club they are because certain people decided they will be the poster boys for the premier league. Sky and the other money men behind football.
As far as these people are concerned we can be a big club, aslong as that lot are bigger because they have too much invested in them.
It's not far fetched to believe when sky got involved with the prem/created the prem they needed a poster boy, they needed someone they could Market on a worldwide scale so they picked a team. Then they pushed a few people into supporting the rise of the scum.
For the record pre sky they had won 7 league titles in-between 1876-1967, post sky it is 12 in 20. They hadn't won a league title in 20 odd years before sky came along and we all know how they won the first one. By cheating. Sky created them and sky run football FACT.
Brilliant post.
ashton287 wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
No there isn't an all consuming hate for us driving this.
It's that shithole in Salford calling the shots, if sometimes indirectly. They have been built up into this super club that represents English football. There are jobs and money at stake in them falling from the top spot. They are the club they are because certain people decided they will be the poster boys for the premier league. Sky and the other money men behind football.
As far as these people are concerned we can be a big club, aslong as that lot are bigger because they have too much invested in them.
It's not far fetched to believe when sky got involved with the prem/created the prem they needed a poster boy, they needed someone they could Market on a worldwide scale so they picked a team. Then they pushed a few people into supporting the rise of the scum.
For the record pre sky they had won 7 league titles in-between 1876-1967, post sky it is 12 in 20. They hadn't won a league title in 20 odd years before sky came along and we all know how they won the first one. By cheating. Sky created them and sky run football FACT.
ashton287 wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
No there isn't an all consuming hate for us driving this.
It's that shithole in Salford calling the shots, if sometimes indirectly. They have been built up into this super club that represents English football. There are jobs and money at stake in them falling from the top spot. They are the club they are because certain people decided they will be the poster boys for the premier league. Sky and the other money men behind football.
As far as these people are concerned we can be a big club, aslong as that lot are bigger because they have too much invested in them.
It's not far fetched to believe when sky got involved with the prem/created the prem they needed a poster boy, they needed someone they could Market on a worldwide scale so they picked a team. Then they pushed a few people into supporting the rise of the scum.
For the record pre sky they had won 7 league titles in-between 1876-1967, post sky it is 12 in 20. They hadn't won a league title in 20 odd years before sky came along and we all know how they won the first one. By cheating. Sky created them and sky run football FACT.
ashton287 wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Corruption in the game is quite easy to believe,there have been plenty of examples.It would be no suprise to find out that a few of Mr.Foy's friends knew what bets to put on.However to think this corruption is because of a hatred of us I find hard to accept
No there isn't an all consuming hate for us driving this.
It's that shithole in Salford calling the shots, if sometimes indirectly. They have been built up into this super club that represents English football. There are jobs and money at stake in them falling from the top spot. They are the club they are because certain people decided they will be the poster boys for the premier league. Sky and the other money men behind football.
As far as these people are concerned we can be a big club, aslong as that lot are bigger because they have too much invested in them.
It's not far fetched to believe when sky got involved with the prem/created the prem they needed a poster boy, they needed someone they could Market on a worldwide scale so they picked a team. Then they pushed a few people into supporting the rise of the scum.
For the record pre sky they had won 7 league titles in-between 1876-1967, post sky it is 12 in 20. They hadn't won a league title in 20 odd years before sky came along and we all know how they won the first one. By cheating. Sky created them and sky run football FACT.
Rag_hater wrote:
There's probably a lot truth in that comment but to me if truth be told it is a comment that contains a bit of envy.And for me the fact that our Sheikh chose us for whatever reason is the same advantage that has been given to them twats,somewhat later than them but it has put us in pole position .If we win a few titles over the next few years as is predicted surely that is because of the same reasons as them fuckers
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: HBlock Cripple, Sparklehorse, Wonderwall and 128 guests