Come Home Danny Boy

[Mase]

Stay where you are Danny Boy.

[london blue 2]

Fuck tevez!

[Moonchesteri]

Stay where you are Danny Boy.

ditto

[Blueonblue]

The last thing we need is another self centred upstart who can't see beyond his next upgraded pay packet and who is a risk to stability.

And you based this on what ?, the fairy stories leaked to the press by the numpty hughes perhaps,

There was certainly no prevarication with either manager before, SP had turned down an offer of three million (With a large jump in wages) for Danny with the players full agreement, SGE had held contract talks with Danny that were all agreeded but not yet signed when he was fired, those terms were exactly the same as the other accademy graduates........numpty offered him half.

[Ted Hughes]

The last thing we need is another self centred upstart who can't see beyond his next upgraded pay packet and who is a risk to stability.

And you based this on what ?, the fairy stories leaked to the press by the numpty hughes perhaps,

There was certainly no prevarication with either manager before, SP had turned down an offer of three million (With a large jump in wages) for Danny with the players full agreement, SGE had held contract talks with Danny that were all agreeded but not yet signed when he was fired, those terms were exactly the same as the other accademy graduates........numpty offered him half.

How come everyone knew he was going to Chelsea then ?

P.S. You've heard from his camp that we're going to sign him haven't you ? Go on, admit it.

[Sideshow Bob]

we don't need him. and he would sulk like a bitch every time he didn't start.

[johnny crossan]

today's MEN

Roberto Mancini laments the loss of Daniel Sturridge on the cheap

Rob Dawson February 29, 2012

If Roberto Mancini had his way, there would have been one more Manchester City player checking in at the Grove Hotel in North London on Sunday evening. City are well represented in Stuart Pearce’s squad with Joe Hart, Gareth Barry, Joleon Lescott, Micah Richards and Adam Johnson all swapping Carrington for London Colney ahead of the re-arranged friendly with Holland tonight. Mancini, however, remains disappointed that Daniel Sturridge only had to travel across the capital to join the England squad, instead of journeying from Manchester. So disappointed in fact, that the Italian, who arrived after Sturridge left City for Chelsea in 2009, made a point of challenging the striker in the tunnel after a game against Bolton at the end of last season. “I asked him last year when he played for Bolton why he left Manchester City and he said he didn’t know,” said Mancini. “I know Sturridge well, I have watched him many times. “Given the chance I think I would have liked to have kept him, but now he is at Chelsea we can do nothing. I know for sure he was one of the best young players that was here.” Pearce is well aware of Sturridge’s ability having blooded the then 17-year-old when manager of City and then taking him to the European Under-21 Championships last summer. After Carlo Ancelotti loaned him to Bolton, Andre Villas-Boas cast aside experienced campaigners like Nicolas Anelka, Florent Malouda and Saloman Kalou to make Sturridge central to his revolution at Chelsea. David Silva: I want to stay at Manchester City for at least two more years He's back! Carlos Tevez turns out for Manchester City EDS squad They are high-profile casualties of the 22-year-old’s rise but Mancini remains unsurprised. He is, however, willing to question why he was allowed to slip through the net at City. “It was not difficult to see that Sturridge was going to be a good player. It was strange because he started out in Manchester and someone let him out of the club for nothing.” Sturridge, who City insisted had asked for astronomical wages to stay, wasn’t allowed to leave for nothing. But the fee set by an FA tribunal – reported to be £3m rising to £6m – was a great deal lower than if it had been agreed on the inflated open market. If Jordan Henderson, a year Sturridge’s junior, is worth £20m to Liverpool then Sturridge, scorer of 11 goals for Chelsea from a wide position in a front three, could command double that, such is the demand for young, English talent. Sheikh Mansour has made a commitment to youth development by pledging £100m for a new training complex in the shadow of the Etihad Stadium. It’s money to make sure Sturridge is the last one who gets away.

Read more at: http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... -the-cheap

[geepeetee]

today's MEN

Roberto Mancini laments the loss of Daniel Sturridge on the cheap

Rob Dawson February 29, 2012

If Roberto Mancini had his way, there would have been one more Manchester City player checking in at the Grove Hotel in North London on Sunday evening. City are well represented in Stuart Pearce’s squad with Joe Hart, Gareth Barry, Joleon Lescott, Micah Richards and Adam Johnson all swapping Carrington for London Colney ahead of the re-arranged friendly with Holland tonight. Mancini, however, remains disappointed that Daniel Sturridge only had to travel across the capital to join the England squad, instead of journeying from Manchester. So disappointed in fact, that the Italian, who arrived after Sturridge left City for Chelsea in 2009, made a point of challenging the striker in the tunnel after a game against Bolton at the end of last season. “I asked him last year when he played for Bolton why he left Manchester City and he said he didn’t know,” said Mancini. “I know Sturridge well, I have watched him many times. “Given the chance I think I would have liked to have kept him, but now he is at Chelsea we can do nothing. I know for sure he was one of the best young players that was here.” Pearce is well aware of Sturridge’s ability having blooded the then 17-year-old when manager of City and then taking him to the European Under-21 Championships last summer. After Carlo Ancelotti loaned him to Bolton, Andre Villas-Boas cast aside experienced campaigners like Nicolas Anelka, Florent Malouda and Saloman Kalou to make Sturridge central to his revolution at Chelsea. David Silva: I want to stay at Manchester City for at least two more years He's back! Carlos Tevez turns out for Manchester City EDS squad They are high-profile casualties of the 22-year-old’s rise but Mancini remains unsurprised. He is, however, willing to question why he was allowed to slip through the net at City. “It was not difficult to see that Sturridge was going to be a good player. It was strange because he started out in Manchester and someone let him out of the club for nothing.” Sturridge, who City insisted had asked for astronomical wages to stay, wasn’t allowed to leave for nothing. But the fee set by an FA tribunal – reported to be £3m rising to £6m – was a great deal lower than if it had been agreed on the inflated open market. If Jordan Henderson, a year Sturridge’s junior, is worth £20m to Liverpool then Sturridge, scorer of 11 goals for Chelsea from a wide position in a front three, could command double that, such is the demand for young, English talent. Sheikh Mansour has made a commitment to youth development by pledging £100m for a new training complex in the shadow of the Etihad Stadium. It’s money to make sure Sturridge is the last one who gets away.

Read more at: http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... -the-cheap

Still not good enough to take us to the next level, regardless of what any paper prints..... Cocky selfish best staying where he is....

[Bianchi on Ice]

Cant see any reason for re-signing sturridge. Had his attitude when he was with us been better then he'd be a part of what is going on now. But, it wasnt, and like Michael Johnson and Stephen Ireland with the best will in the world none of those three, even at their best, would hold down a place in the side now. You should never go back. wives, girlfriends, jobs, sequels, bands getting back together, re-signing footballers...(even SWP, sadly)...just leave it and move on.

[aaron bond]

I'm sure that interview with Mancini above was done a while back, around the time of the Chelsea game.

Sturridge has looked good this season, he always did look good when he played for us in my opinion.

I remember just before he left all the reports were about him wanting 65k a week for his first proper contract and City were unwilling to pay that. How true that is I don't know.

I don't think we need him though. He'd take up a similar role to Balotelli most likely and I don't think he's better than Balotelli.

[john68]

Cant see any reason for re-signing sturridge. Had his attitude when he was with us been better then he'd be a part of what is going on now. But, it wasnt, and like Michael Johnson and Stephen Ireland with the best will in the world none of those three, even at their best, would hold down a place in the side now. You should never go back. wives, girlfriends, jobs, -sequels, bands getting back together, re-signing footballers...(even SWP, sadly)...just leave it and move on.

With that in mind, can you give us your opinion of the re-signing of Billy Meredith and Denis Law?

[Bianchi on Ice]

Cant see any reason for re-signing sturridge. Had his attitude when he was with us been better then he'd be a part of what is going on now. But, it wasnt, and like Michael Johnson and Stephen Ireland with the best will in the world none of those three, even at their best, would hold down a place in the side now. You should never go back. wives, girlfriends, jobs, -sequels, bands getting back together, re-signing footballers...(even SWP, sadly)...just leave it and move on.

With that in mind, can you give us your opinion of the re-signing of Billy Meredith and Denis Law?

We dont need them John, and anyway, its obvious where laws allegiance lies

[Ted Hughes]

Sturridge's performance for England said everything about the player & the fan's/media response to him imo. Came on, put in one great run & cross, had a decent effort on goal a bit later, missed an absolute sitter. Failed to track back, barely linked up with Richards or any other fullback, kept getting caught in possession, gave the ball away & couldn't be arsed chasing to win it back, went off injured, got 'man of the match' award. Should be playing for Utd.

[johnny crossan]

and on....
EXCLUSIVE: Man City want to buy Sturridge back from Chelsea
By Sami Mokbel
Last updated at 11:02 PM on 2nd March 2012

Manchester City are plotting a sensational bid to bring Daniel Sturridge back to the club after enquiring about the Chelsea striker’s contract situation.

Sportsmail has learned that City have been asked to be kept updated on developments regarding Sturridge's future.

The England international only left the Etihad Stadium in July 2009 after agreeing to join Chelsea following a contract dispute.

Sturridge's future at Stamford Bridge has been the subject of growing speculation in recent weeks.

The forward is keen to start negotiations over a new Chelsea deal, though the club are yet to call him in for formal discussions due to the fact he still has two years left on his existing contract.

And the 22-year-old is growing increasingly agitated at Andre Villas-Boas' decision to use him in a wide role, rather than his preferred central striker position.

News of his concerns have filtered back to his former club, who are now trying to manoeuvre themselves into a position to strike if Sturridge becomes obtainable.

Chelsea will offer Sturridge a new contract, which will include a significant pay-rise from his current £65,000-per-week package.

But City's decision to take a watching brief on how the situation regarding Sturridge's contract develops is an interesting development.

Roberto Mancini is a huge admirer of Sturridge and admitted this week that he found it 'strange' that City - who were managed by Mark Hughes at the time - let him leave.

And the Italian would jump at the chance at having Sturridge back at the club in the future.

However, City will not be the only in club for Sturridge if he becomes available. Sportsmail revealed last month how Arsenal are also keeping close tabs on Sturridge.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ridge.html

[geepeetee]

and on....
EXCLUSIVE: Man City want to buy Sturridge back from Chelsea
By Sami Mokbel
Last updated at 11:02 PM on 2nd March 2012

Manchester City are plotting a sensational bid to bring Daniel Sturridge back to the club after enquiring about the Chelsea striker’s contract situation.

Sportsmail has learned that City have been asked to be kept updated on developments regarding Sturridge's future.

The England international only left the Etihad Stadium in July 2009 after agreeing to join Chelsea following a contract dispute.

Sturridge's future at Stamford Bridge has been the subject of growing speculation in recent weeks.

The forward is keen to start negotiations over a new Chelsea deal, though the club are yet to call him in for formal discussions due to the fact he still has two years left on his existing contract.

And the 22-year-old is growing increasingly agitated at Andre Villas-Boas' decision to use him in a wide role, rather than his preferred central striker position.

News of his concerns have filtered back to his former club, who are now trying to manoeuvre themselves into a position to strike if Sturridge becomes obtainable.

Chelsea will offer Sturridge a new contract, which will include a significant pay-rise from his current £65,000-per-week package.

But City's decision to take a watching brief on how the situation regarding Sturridge's contract develops is an interesting development.

Roberto Mancini is a huge admirer of Sturridge and admitted this week that he found it 'strange' that City - who were managed by Mark Hughes at the time - let him leave.

And the Italian would jump at the chance at having Sturridge back at the club in the future.

However, City will not be the only in club for Sturridge if he becomes available. Sportsmail revealed last month how Arsenal are also keeping close tabs on Sturridge.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ridge.html

What a load of tabloid led bullshit .... Fucking Daily Mail again jeez what a waste of time again. How do.you spell "wankers"

[LookMumImOnMCF.net]

Only watching motd but looks like he's having a stinker.

[johnny crossan]

Roberto Mancini is poised to make a shock bid to bring Daniel Sturridge back to Manchester City
Rob Dawson April 17, 2012

Manchester City old boy Daniel Sturridge is being lined up to form part of Roberto Mancini’s new guard next season. Up to six of the current first-team are facing the axe this summer with doubts over the long-term futures of Carlos Tevez, Edin Dzeko, Mario Balotelli, Adam Johnson, Aleksandar Kolarov and Nigel de Jong. And Mancini, who has silenced the critics calling for his head with comfortable wins over West Brom and Norwich which have reignited the all-Manchester title race, is also plotting the arrival of three new players with Chelsea striker Sturridge understood to be high up on the Italian’s wish-list. Sturridge, who moved to Stamford Bridge under a cloud three years ago after City reportedly refused to match his wage demands, has fallen out of favour since Roberto Di Matteo replaced Andre Villas-Boas as Chelsea manager last month. He was a first-team regular under Villas-Boas but has dropped down the pecking order during Di Matteo’s short reign, losing his place for key games to Salomon Kalou. The 22-year-old has only completed 90 minutes twice in Di Matteo’s 12 games in charge. Carlos Tevez: Manchester City will turn up heat on Manchester United Roberto Mancini: Carlos Tevez's Manchester City future still in doubt He was an unused substitute when Chelsea visited the Etihad Stadium last month and against Tottenham in Sunday’s FA Cup semi-final. Di Matteo has also criticised the striker, who made his England debut in November, challenging him to ‘play for the team’. The ex-City Academy star is expected to be on the bench again when Chelsea face Barcelona in the Champions League semi-final first leg at Stamford Bridge tomorrow. It’s likely that Sturridge, who is yet to open talks over an extension to his current deal with runs out in two years, will wait and see if interim manager Di Matteo gets the job permanently before making any decisions about his future. Mancini has made no secret of his admiration for Sturridge, who would command a fee of around £20million if he’s allowed to leave. Before City’s trip to Chelsea in December, Mancini said: “It was strange because Sturridge was developed in Manchester and someone let him go. “If Sturridge was here today, he’d be in the first team. I’ve watched him many times and I know him well.
Read more at: http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... ester-city?

[Crossie]

I'm just not feeling it.

Right selfish bastard with the ball. Not in the same league as Aguero or Tevez. We need to really think about how any new players will impact on the team. Stop signing individuals, think about the bigger picture.

Its a no from me.

[BobbyJ1956]

He's a selfish, sulking prick. That never got in the way of signing players who were good enough, but he's not good enough. He adds nothing to the players City have already. I'd rather give Guidetti a run in the team, or Mario with his head right, or even take back
my "never, he's finished" and keep Tevez.

[Beeks]

Thought you meant Danny Mills...