Ted Hughes wrote:An Arse fan on Talkshite made a great point earlier.
He basically asked why Arsenal moved from Highbury to increase revenue. charging everyone fortunes, in order to compete with the Man Utd's of the world, if they're not actually going to spend money. Why not just stay at highbury, where they were all happy.
Pretty good point if you ask me.
RodneyRodney wrote:Like many on here I don't want him. Gettin old , injury history and I think he's just HAD his best season.
MODS - how about a vote on this ?
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:An Arse fan on Talkshite made a great point earlier.
He basically asked why Arsenal moved from Highbury to increase revenue. charging everyone fortunes, in order to compete with the Man Utd's of the world, if they're not actually going to spend money. Why not just stay at highbury, where they were all happy.
Pretty good point if you ask me.
They are paying for the Emirates in extremely tight schedual and once they are debt free from that they will have fantastic fortunes to spend. I very much agree with that approach in their case. It was always going to mean that they'd be out of the genuine title challenge for ten years or so.
blues-clues wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:An Arse fan on Talkshite made a great point earlier.
He basically asked why Arsenal moved from Highbury to increase revenue. charging everyone fortunes, in order to compete with the Man Utd's of the world, if they're not actually going to spend money. Why not just stay at highbury, where they were all happy.
Pretty good point if you ask me.
They are paying for the Emirates in extremely tight schedual and once they are debt free from that they will have fantastic fortunes to spend. I very much agree with that approach in their case. It was always going to mean that they'd be out of the genuine title challenge for ten years or so.
Whatever the schedule for paying for the stadium surely the original plan did not involve selling players of the quality of Fabregas, Toure, Clichy, Nasri and Van Persie.
The squabble over the shares was all about securing the future revenue stream -not paying for the stadium. Arsenal owe their participation in the CL this year to RVP. If he leaves they will do well to get out of the group stages and even better to get back in it the year after. That revenue stream will be fooked and paying for the stadium will have to wait.
s1ty m wrote:RVP is a brilliant player, when fit and on his day. He'd score plenty for us, I am sure of it.
I'd rather stick with Tevez or pursue Cavani. I was very keen on RVP a few months ago, but there are too many good arguments, not least age, that have changed my thinking. Cavani is 25. We should go after him if Tevez or Dzeko are leaving.
PALUS wrote:Lavezzi is sing for PSG.So i daubt that Napoli will sell two best players at once.
s1ty m wrote:PALUS wrote:Lavezzi is sing for PSG.So i daubt that Napoli will sell two best players at once.
Maybe not, but maybe they would. At 25, I think he is ideal.
Sideshow Bob wrote:are you referring to lavezzi?? i've seen nothing on cavani to PSG.
edit: nice edit job, palus!
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Paul68 and 184 guests