Esky wrote:Underwhelmed. English or not, pace or not, he'd be fourth choice at Swansea behind Dyer, Routledge and now Hernandez.
I really don't understand why he'd come, nor why we'd pay lunatic wages to someone who's less talented and likely to play less than Johnson did.
Esky wrote:Underwhelmed. English or not, pace or not, he'd be fourth choice at Swansea behind Dyer, Routledge and now Hernandez.
I really don't understand why he'd come, nor why we'd pay lunatic wages to someone who's less talented and likely to play less than Johnson did.
Green & Blue wrote:Esky wrote:Underwhelmed. English or not, pace or not, he'd be fourth choice at Swansea behind Dyer, Routledge and now Hernandez.
I really don't understand why he'd come, nor why we'd pay lunatic wages to someone who's less talented and likely to play less than Johnson did.
4th choice is a strange one.He started 38 games for Swansea last season.
How has he suddenly fell behind Routledge all of a sudden?
Green & Blue wrote:Esky wrote:Underwhelmed. English or not, pace or not, he'd be fourth choice at Swansea behind Dyer, Routledge and now Hernandez.
I really don't understand why he'd come, nor why we'd pay lunatic wages to someone who's less talented and likely to play less than Johnson did.
4th choice is a strange one.He started 38 games for Swansea last season.
How has he suddenly fell behind Routledge all of a sudden?
Esky wrote:Green & Blue wrote:Esky wrote:Underwhelmed. English or not, pace or not, he'd be fourth choice at Swansea behind Dyer, Routledge and now Hernandez.
I really don't understand why he'd come, nor why we'd pay lunatic wages to someone who's less talented and likely to play less than Johnson did.
4th choice is a strange one.He started 38 games for Swansea last season.
How has he suddenly fell behind Routledge all of a sudden?
Fair point. I based it off reading not606 where global opinion is that the other three are better options (assuming Hernandez settles). They say Sinclair was great in the Championship but looked a limited player last year who didn't entirely make the step up, despite game time.
And to the other post, didn't he leave Chelsea because he wasn't playing at a Champions League club? And didn't Johnson leave because he wasn't getting anywhere enough game time?
If he does well, I'll be thrilled - he's cheap, fast and British, so it could work - but SWP and Johnson were cautionary tales.
Swansea have confirmed it's done.
mcfc1632 wrote:Have not followed too closely and I know that some will be underwhelmed - although I think that he could offer the same (but slightly different) option that Johnson could have - except be less vocal about being an impact player
And if it is true (not sure myself) that Swansea tried to get heavy with us then perhaps Marwood or someone deserves some positive comment?? Some seem to be willing to put the boot in without any clear evidence of mistakes - perhaps this is clearly eveidence of something more positive ?? so should deserve comment?
mcfc1632 wrote:Have not followed too closely and I know that some will be underwhelmed - although I think that he could offer the same (but slightly different) option that Johnson could have - except be less vocal about being an impact player
And if it is true (not sure myself) that Swansea tried to get heavy with us then perhaps Marwood or someone deserves some positive comment?? Some seem to be willing to put the boot in without any clear evidence of mistakes - perhaps this is clearly eveidence of something more positive ?? so should deserve comment?
Ted Hughes wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Have not followed too closely and I know that some will be underwhelmed - although I think that he could offer the same (but slightly different) option that Johnson could have - except be less vocal about being an impact player
And if it is true (not sure myself) that Swansea tried to get heavy with us then perhaps Marwood or someone deserves some positive comment?? Some seem to be willing to put the boot in without any clear evidence of mistakes - perhaps this is clearly eveidence of something more positive ?? so should deserve comment?
None of them know if Marwood is even in the country.
They just make it all up.
john@staustell wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Have not followed too closely and I know that some will be underwhelmed - although I think that he could offer the same (but slightly different) option that Johnson could have - except be less vocal about being an impact player
And if it is true (not sure myself) that Swansea tried to get heavy with us then perhaps Marwood or someone deserves some positive comment?? Some seem to be willing to put the boot in without any clear evidence of mistakes - perhaps this is clearly eveidence of something more positive ?? so should deserve comment?
None of them know if Marwood is even in the country.
They just make it all up.
Sudden link with Theo Walcott seems to have made Mr 'Hard-nosed' Swansea Chairman think again. Funny coincidence, that!
Slim wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Slim wrote:Did you get football tactics for dummies the other day?
No manager is a tactical genius because he alters a role depending on who they're playing and what their matchup is...THEY ALL DO THAT.
What the fuck do you think a manager does? Sits around bitching about Marwood all week and hopes his players win on the weekend?
FFS, I'm just gonna stop replying, it's like the fucking kindegarten of football tactics and you are the one eating paste.
Second round knock out!!!
Well aren't you the liverpool of the MCF.net universe.
Fairly certain if you want to claim it as a win then we both lost, I may have lost, but you won through stupidity...well done you, now put your mittens back on Nancy before you hurt yourself.
Mancio4ever wrote:NQDP, Slim,
I have insulted You a couple of times and been slagged by You a nice deal. That's was for the sake of proper frequentation and preservation of the best Football Forum ever and the dedicated care You both apply to such important task and responsability.
I think time has come fair to state how much I love You both, and even more for the exquisite fun granted by this public exchange of view on the moderation policy of this board.
for my humble 5 pc. I think that Antti, once discounted a wide deployment of his huge ego, is spot on insisting to apply a strict control of main difference btw US and BM, while Slim is absolutely bang on the money in saying that our Finn Cerberus (tbh, I actually struggle to even imagine Antti dressed in a fascist uniform, lol) can be "very flayboyant" in making his points.
Once said that, as an humble, non Blue born, apprentice I now can shut up and fuck off.
make love, no war.
xavi6 wrote:Sinclair has arrived for his medical
ant london wrote:xavi6 wrote:Sinclair has arrived for his medical
Friday is the new Tuesday
Glad it looks like we may have at least one new face though...and some pace
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: blues2win, city72, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase and 98 guests