Zero investment

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Zero investment

Postby dazby » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:23 am

Consider the quality of our current squad and the quality of our youth.

If we didn't bring in a single senior player for the next 3 seasons, do you still think we could compete and win trophies? Could we maintain the rage even if we sold some players and promoted from within?
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Zero investment

Postby Hazy2 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:29 am

dazby wrote:Consider the quality of our current squad and the quality of our youth.

If we didn't bring in a single senior player for the next 3 seasons, do you still think we could compete and win trophies? Could we maintain the rage even if we sold some players and promoted from within?


No, Every players needs competition for shirt from Hart to Yaya, we need to build on what we have not sit back. We need a centre half for a start.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9693
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Zero investment

Postby lets all have a disco » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:33 am

No way.

The rags signed a 25 million 'CROCK' and he has scored 20+ goals already and his team sit at the top of the league by 7 points.

ALWAYS,ALWAYS TRY TO IMPROVE.
He was never me,me,me but always you,you,you
User avatar
lets all have a disco
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22479
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:20 pm
Location: Blue Army
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: STILL MICAH RICHARDS

Re: Zero investment

Postby Goaters 103 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:45 am

dazby wrote:Consider the quality of our current squad and the quality of our youth.

If we didn't bring in a single senior player for the next 3 seasons, do you still think we could compete and win trophies? Could we maintain the rage even if we sold some players and promoted from within?


Same answer here as to your opinion that we would go unbeaten this season.

Absolutely no chance.
User avatar
Goaters 103
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Manchester Born and Bred, City by the Grace of God

Re: Zero investment

Postby Ted Hughes » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:18 pm

No.

But signing a 30 year old £25 mil CROCKs isn't the way to go either. At a pinch, a signing like that that would have been acceptable this season as a one off, last throw of the dice, but clearly there was no real enthusiasm for it (or for DeRossi) from the 'powers that be'.

They know that phase 1 is over, & it's important that we now bring through some of the young players, to prove we are the right club to sign for. At the same time, all the players young & old who are taking money out of the club but unlikely to figure in the 1st team need to go & be replaced with genuine talent, young & older. Balotelli for instance needs to go if he doesn't contribute this season.

I think we'll make 1 perhaps 2 big signings & the rest will be purely signed on potential.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Zero investment

Postby Risby » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:01 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:No.

But signing a 30 year old £25 mil CROCKs isn't the way to go either. At a pinch, a signing like that that would have been acceptable this season as a one off, last throw of the dice, but clearly there was no real enthusiasm for it (or for DeRossi) from the 'powers that be'.

They know that phase 1 is over, & it's important that we now bring through some of the young players, to prove we are the right club to sign for. At the same time, all the players young & old who are taking money out of the club but unlikely to figure in the 1st team need to go & be replaced with genuine talent, young & older. Balotelli for instance needs to go if he doesn't contribute this season.

I think we'll make 1 perhaps 2 big signings & the rest will be purely signed on potential.


I agree. I don't think we will ever see the massive influx of players again as our squad is strong. I also agree that we will sign two/three big players a season and a few youths throughout the season.
Risby
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 987
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:09 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Zaba

Re: Zero investment

Postby Wooders » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:12 am

have you ever heard of a team called Arsenal ?

We don't need conjecture to wonder what happens to strong teams with a good youth setup who don't invest
Citys new Motto "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women"
Wooders
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15697
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: UK
Supporter of: City

Re: Zero investment

Postby patrickblue » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:41 am

dazby wrote:Consider the quality of our current squad and the quality of our youth.

If we didn't bring in a single senior player for the next 3 seasons, do you still think we could compete and win trophies? Could we maintain the rage even if we sold some players and promoted from within?


The scum do it, it must be true, rasherchops said so.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
User avatar
patrickblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Newbury Berks
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: The one and only Goat

Re: Zero investment

Postby Arjan Van Schotte » Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:43 am

Wooders wrote:have you ever heard of a team called Arsenal ?

We don't need conjecture to wonder what happens to strong teams with a good youth setup who don't invest


if by "a good youth set up" you mean spending relatively large amounts of money bringing in teenagers and hoping that a couple of them come good....

Also, arsenal may not bring in "big names", but they do spend a reasonable amount of cash on players themselves... They did for instance spend £45m+ just a few months ago...
"Whatever it is that we "bought" - we didn't put it up for sale..."

Image
User avatar
Arjan Van Schotte
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8692
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Elland Back
Supporter of: Манчестер Сити

Re: Zero investment

Postby dazby » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:13 am

Just to give my response to the question. I think we could win at least one trophy each season for the next two, but not the third.

Even so, the core is there. It's just a case now of moving out the unhappy ones and bringing in one or two to fill the spots.

What I think is really important from here is that the young guys who have been here for a while force there way through to a regular spot. We have to show young players that if they come here they will have a chance to break through.

This is also important for FFP purposes to bring the wage bill down.
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 150 guests