john68 wrote:Goalkeeping question for Sis...
Years ago, keepers always seemed to try and catch the ball and punching seemed to be used only as a last resort when a keeper was stretching or couldn't get cleanly to the ball. Not sure I am right with this Sis, but it is how it seemed to be then.
Now punching the ball seems to be almost the 1st choice for many keepers. I noticed David James's technique was often to parry the ball down and collect it as it bounced back up, even for some quite simple shots.
In past times, keepers' gloves were quite thin and more accurately reflected the hand and finger movements. Maybe giving a keeper more control. Now they are massive. Does the size of the gloves and the mass of padding affect how the glove responds to hand/finger movements? What gains do the new style gloves give a keeper?
Thanks.
Garth Crooks question there haha
I've used high end keeper gloves after accidentally being sent them by a sports firm in an order mixup. These particular £100 pair were not actually conducive to punching because of the support in the fingers which prevent a proper fist being made easily.
The palm of the glove was so refined that it deadened the impact of the ball so reducing the likelihood of the ball bouncing out after a one handed save, but the same properties reduce the impact when coming to catch meaning it is, in theory much easier to catch with the new technology
It all points towards it being a tactical issue, and I wonder if statistically there is evidence showing that in percentage terms, its safer to punch than to come to catch and drop the ball at your feet
Interesting what s o f makes of this and what is driving it - because I can't accept its the glove which is more advanced than ever