Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
Ted Hughes wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
That's fine if they actually do anything special but they don't. There is hardly any difference offensively but an enormous difference defensively.
Anyone who says we have struggled to produce fluent passing football with Lescott playing or that he hasn't made a decent contribution to it, is talking shit.
When ANY of our centre backs try to be clever, they stand a decent chance of giving the ball away. When they play it simple, they rarely give the ball away.
If Lescott had played today, chances are we woukd have kept a clean sheet & still scored 4.
Ted Hughes wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
That's fine if they actually do anything special but they don't. There is hardly any difference offensively but an enormous difference defensively.
Anyone who says we have struggled to produce fluent passing football with Lescott playing or that he hasn't made a decent contribution to it, is talking shit.
When ANY of our centre backs try to be clever, they stand a decent chance of giving the ball away. When they play it simple, they rarely give the ball away.
If Lescott had played today, chances are we woukd have kept a clean sheet & still scored 4.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
That's fine if they actually do anything special but they don't. There is hardly any difference offensively but an enormous difference defensively.
Anyone who says we have struggled to produce fluent passing football with Lescott playing or that he hasn't made a decent contribution to it, is talking shit.
When ANY of our centre backs try to be clever, they stand a decent chance of giving the ball away. When they play it simple, they rarely give the ball away.
If Lescott had played today, chances are we woukd have kept a clean sheet & still scored 4.
You do realize that sonce November Lescott has hardly figured..yet we have scored a billion goals and conceded very few...you do know that dont you ???????????
Pellers has it spot on......hence the record , hence the 1 point from Arsenal , hence the incredible play we dish out week in and week out.
Fuck Lescott and the whingers that harp on about him being in the side instead of A B or fuckign C.....we are where we are because of Pellegrinis management.
Herb wrote:We don't deal well with corners and we fail in that regard because Joe can't deal with corners.
Ted Hughes wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:He basically gives it to someone close to him who hopefully can play.That's the job of the defender on the ball.
I think Pellegrini, who gets to tell defenders what their actual job is when given the ball, would disagree with that statement. He clearly wants them involved in build up play as often as possible.
That's fine if they actually do anything special but they don't. There is hardly any difference offensively but an enormous difference defensively.
Anyone who says we have struggled to produce fluent passing football with Lescott playing or that he hasn't made a decent contribution to it, is talking shit.
When ANY of our centre backs try to be clever, they stand a decent chance of giving the ball away. When they play it simple, they rarely give the ball away.
If Lescott had played today, chances are we woukd have kept a clean sheet & still scored 4.
You do realize that sonce November Lescott has hardly figured..yet we have scored a billion goals and conceded very few...you do know that dont you ???????????
Pellers has it spot on......hence the record , hence the 1 point from Arsenal , hence the incredible play we dish out week in and week out.
Fuck Lescott and the whingers that harp on about him being in the side instead of A B or fuckign C.....we are where we are because of Pellegrinis management.
We are where we are because of Pellegrini's management & on the whole we look better with Lescott next to Kompany.
Anyone who thinks Demichelis' performance today was acceptable, is a dick. And if Lescott ever played that badly, you wouldn't give a fuck about a couple of passes, you would want him dropping.
Demichelis has had one decent game defensively. Other than that he has been more of a danger to our goal than Luis Suarez was.
Cocacolajojo wrote:
First goal the player has the entire goal to shoot at. Perhaps could have stood closer to the post but in that situation when Kompany sells him short, it's a tricky one.
Second corner goes in low so Joe can't parry it and then Demi let's go of his man. What you could get at that point is a reaction save but if you don't get it you can't really fault him for it as the trajectory of the ball is so steep.
Worst keeper of the league, you're having a laugh.
Tesl wrote:Don't know why you bother arguing with him Ted, there isn't any point. His opinion was made up long ago, doesn't matter what Lescott (and now Hart) ever do, it will always be completely their fault.
That he could argue Boyata's stupid red card was Lescott's fault with a straight face tells you already what a clown he is. Pointless waste of time.
(And yes if it was me I'd start Lescott and Kompany as our first pairing)
For what its worth with Hart, I don't think you can blame the first on him, once Kompany had been skipped past he had the entire goal to shoot at. Not much he could really do there. The second he has a bit more culpability though. Still that last week "JOE IS BACK" and this week hes apparently the worst goalkeeper in the league ....... well thats just more idiocy.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Go fuck yourself you fuckign little TIT....pointless was when you squirmed out of a crack you jumped up shite.
When Lescott gets sold would that mean you will fuck off for good?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:When Lescott gets sold would that mean you will fuck off for good?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, Google [Bot], john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot], ruralblue, salford city and 109 guests