LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:I agree he's out too much, but rarely fit is a stretch. Problem is he's so good and so relied upon, we can't afford for him to be out the amount if time that he is.
DoomMerchant wrote:If we would have kept Tevez the quadruple could have been a reality. Stupid decision.
The best player City have had in my time watching them. Madness that they wouldn't try to keep hold of him.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Having said that, we were far more than a Tevez away from beating Barca though. That was down to the negative tactics in the first leg mixed with an individual mistake underlined by the corrupt refereeing.
Your point about the refereeing is absolute bollocks. I can imagine it's spouted off in every other topic on this board at the mo. Fact is the refereeing was shoddy for both sides, hardly a reason for a poor City result.
I very, very rarely blame referees.
I don't blame him for the result and yes he gave big decisions against both sides.
However the small decisions all went to Barca, every one of them.
Pique was holding on to Dzeko's shirt, yet they get the free kick. Iniesta flopped like a fish when Toure tackled him fairly and was running away with the ball. They get the free kick.
Every time we tackled them, they seemed to get the decision.
Not saying we would have won otherwise, but we potentially could have had a lot more attacks and chances if they weren't awarded a free kick every time we fairly won the ball.