disagree as it wasn't Valdes who ensured we went out, it was poor finishing, individual mistakes at the back, players under par and poor tactics in the 1st matchdazby wrote:If Valdes was a lesser keeper we'd be through to the next round and not Barca. Simple as that.
BobbyJ1956 wrote:Is this another of Pellegrini's stubbornly firm convictions, either that Valdes is the best around or just that Joe isn't good enough? I think Hart should be City's goalkeeper for years to come. He's got youth on his side, he's English, and if VV got the job over him Hart will be off to one of City's rivals, to their benefit.
DoomMerchant wrote:BobbyJ1956 wrote:Is this another of Pellegrini's stubbornly firm convictions, either that Valdes is the best around or just that Joe isn't good enough? I think Hart should be City's goalkeeper for years to come. He's got youth on his side, he's English, and if VV got the job over him Hart will be off to one of City's rivals, to their benefit.
Hart's among the worst distributors of the ball and I believe he isn't at all better than valdes.
john@staustell wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:BobbyJ1956 wrote:Is this another of Pellegrini's stubbornly firm convictions, either that Valdes is the best around or just that Joe isn't good enough? I think Hart should be City's goalkeeper for years to come. He's got youth on his side, he's English, and if VV got the job over him Hart will be off to one of City's rivals, to their benefit.
Hart's among the worst distributors of the ball and I believe he isn't at all better than valdes.
I'm with you Doomie. This season has taught the boss(es) bad things about our keepers.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:john@staustell wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:BobbyJ1956 wrote:Is this another of Pellegrini's stubbornly firm convictions, either that Valdes is the best around or just that Joe isn't good enough? I think Hart should be City's goalkeeper for years to come. He's got youth on his side, he's English, and if VV got the job over him Hart will be off to one of City's rivals, to their benefit.
Hart's among the worst distributors of the ball and I believe he isn't at all better than valdes.
I'm with you Doomie. This season has taught the boss(es) bad things about our keepers.
Don't disagree about his distribution but I would've thought that this season has taught the bosses some good things too, for example Hart having the strength of character to pull himself together following a dip in form and start performing at a high level again.
john@staustell wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:john@staustell wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:BobbyJ1956 wrote:Is this another of Pellegrini's stubbornly firm convictions, either that Valdes is the best around or just that Joe isn't good enough? I think Hart should be City's goalkeeper for years to come. He's got youth on his side, he's English, and if VV got the job over him Hart will be off to one of City's rivals, to their benefit.
Hart's among the worst distributors of the ball and I believe he isn't at all better than valdes.
I'm with you Doomie. This season has taught the boss(es) bad things about our keepers.
Don't disagree about his distribution but I would've thought that this season has taught the bosses some good things too, for example Hart having the strength of character to pull himself together following a dip in form and start performing at a high level again.
So maybe it's an upgrade going with Hart and Valdes instead of Hart and Pants?
john@staustell wrote:
So maybe it's an upgrade going with Hart and Valdes instead of Hart and Pants?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, Blue In Bolton, Bluemoon4610, Majestic-12 [Bot], sheblue and 165 guests