Nigels Tackle wrote:all games the w/e of the 11-14th april are kicking off 7 minutes 'late' to mark the 25th anniversary of the hillsborough disaster
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26685698
guess who we are playing that weekend....
Wonderwall wrote:
FFS really?
I am pro justice for the 96 but I think its a stupid thing to do, mark the actual time.
When will the whole of football NOT be require to mark the anniversary? I have no qualms with liverpool marking however they want as they were impacted. However, I dont see why everyone else has to? In fact when it was the 50th Munich anniversary, Utd didnt request every team to play without names and in old fashioned shirts.
HOWEVER after all that, I think this will be a good thing for us as its a distraction from preparations, just like it was for the rags.
Breks wrote:Wonderwall wrote:
FFS really?
I am pro justice for the 96 but I think its a stupid thing to do, mark the actual time.
When will the whole of football NOT be require to mark the anniversary? I have no qualms with liverpool marking however they want as they were impacted. However, I dont see why everyone else has to? In fact when it was the 50th Munich anniversary, Utd didnt request every team to play without names and in old fashioned shirts.
HOWEVER after all that, I think this will be a good thing for us as its a distraction from preparations, just like it was for the rags.
Typical Scousers. They are quick to forget their part in the Heisell stadium disaster though.
Breks wrote:I hope we score a 96th minute winner. I hate the scouse cunts.
Wonderwall wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:all games the w/e of the 11-14th april are kicking off 7 minutes 'late' to mark the 25th anniversary of the hillsborough disaster
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26685698
guess who we are playing that weekend....
FFS really?
I am pro justice for the 96 but I think its a stupid thing to do, mark the actual time.
When will the whole of football NOT be require to mark the anniversary? I have no qualms with liverpool marking however they want as they were impacted. However, I dont see why everyone else has to? In fact when it was the 50th Munich anniversary, Utd didnt request every team to play without names and in old fashioned shirts.
HOWEVER after all that, I think this will be a good thing for us as its a distraction from preparations, just like it was for the rags.
Wonderwall wrote: FFS really? I am pro justice for the 96 but I think its a stupid thing to do, mark the actual time. When will the whole of football NOT be require to mark the anniversary? I have no qualms with liverpool marking however they want as they were impacted. However, I dont see why everyone else has to? In fact when it was the 50th Munich anniversary, Utd didnt request every team to play without names and in old fashioned shirts. HOWEVER after all that, I think this will be a good thing for us as its a distraction from preparations, just like it was for the rags.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Does the Bradford disaster ever get remembered?
ant london wrote:
No it doesn't and, to be fair, that made for much better TV
Beefymcfc wrote:I have no issues with this whatsoever and on the 25th Anniversary it will be a poignant moment. What I don't get though is this 7 mins late business. Yes, the game finished at 15:06 (even though it should never have been started) but what has that got to do with games that are not only being played on different dates but at different times as well. And in reality, if the games have now been scheduled for 7 minutes later, they are no longer late, they are on time.
A stupid way to recognise the loss of so many lives and sounds to me that it's basis is founded in commercial enterprise. If anything they should have rescheduled our game to coincide with at least the time, but no, that couldn't happen, could it!
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, nottsblue, Paul G, stevefromdonny and 128 guests