The Maine Man wrote:It is so obvious that the Scum are being given every opportunity to get through by the repeated easy draws (impartial and random, my arse). This is clearly being set up to be a Scum v Dippers final on Gerrards birthday and final game for the club. It's a farce. And the wankfest that will follow will all be about how these '2 great clubs respect the FA Cup'. Let's hope Palace and Preston can upset the script.
Ted Hughes wrote:The Maine Man wrote:It is so obvious that the Scum are being given every opportunity to get through by the repeated easy draws (impartial and random, my arse). This is clearly being set up to be a Scum v Dippers final on Gerrards birthday and final game for the club. It's a farce. And the wankfest that will follow will all be about how these '2 great clubs respect the FA Cup'. Let's hope Palace and Preston can upset the script.
Tbh, City & Chelsea had easy games.
london blue 2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:The Maine Man wrote:It is so obvious that the Scum are being given every opportunity to get through by the repeated easy draws (impartial and random, my arse). This is clearly being set up to be a Scum v Dippers final on Gerrards birthday and final game for the club. It's a farce. And the wankfest that will follow will all be about how these '2 great clubs respect the FA Cup'. Let's hope Palace and Preston can upset the script.
Tbh, City & Chelsea had easy games.
Maybe TMM is suggesting we (MCFC and Chelsea) played a part in giving them this opportunity, now that would be some conspiricy.
Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:
You're one of the two that still doesn't believe there is a bias, am I right?
london blue 2 wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:
You're one of the two that still doesn't believe there is a bias, am I right?
No you're not right.
I dont have the time or effort to justify myself but in a nutshell:
I agree about the bias based on the media playing to the biggest fanbases, and the powers that be ensuring the success of the "powerful clubs" (FFP etc). But NOT the ridiculous conspiricies about Rags getting a fair draw and the world and its dog being against city everytime someone says a bad word about us.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:
You're one of the two that still doesn't believe there is a bias, am I right?
No you're not right.
I dont have the time or effort to justify myself but in a nutshell:
I agree about the bias based on the media playing to the biggest fanbases, and the powers that be ensuring the success of the "powerful clubs" (FFP etc). But NOT the ridiculous conspiricies about Rags getting a fair draw and the world and its dog being against city everytime someone says a bad word about us.
To be fair to TMM and looking at this purely objectively, there do seem to be a lot of coincidences occurring which might suggest that they're not quite the coincidences they seem to be.
It really does seem a little bit strange.
london blue 2 wrote:Original Dub wrote:london blue 2 wrote:
You're one of the two that still doesn't believe there is a bias, am I right?
No you're not right.
I dont have the time or effort to justify myself but in a nutshell:
I agree about the bias based on the media playing to the biggest fanbases, and the powers that be ensuring the success of the "powerful clubs" (FFP etc). But NOT the ridiculous conspiricies about Rags getting a fair draw and the world and its dog being against city everytime someone says a bad word about us.
london blue 2 wrote:Well the only thing that has made the FA cup look favourable to the Rags and Dippers is the fact that City, Chelsea and to a lesser extent Spuds completely ballsed up thier comfortable home draws.
london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
Steady on old chum.
When you post comments like that it sounds as though you're declaring yourself to be the principled paragon of virtuous integrity and all embracing perspicacity.
The trouble is, such a halo requires constant polishing.
Slim wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
Steady on old chum.
When you post comments like that it sounds as though you're declaring yourself to be the principled paragon of virtuous integrity and all embracing perspicacity.
The trouble is, such a halo requires constant polishing.
Word of the day calendar?
Nigels Tackle wrote:Slim wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
Steady on old chum.
When you post comments like that it sounds as though you're declaring yourself to be the principled paragon of virtuous integrity and all embracing perspicacity.
The trouble is, such a halo requires constant polishing.
Word of the day calendar?
i can't even pronounce it!
Nigels Tackle wrote:Slim wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Thanks for your thoughts. In response - if certain people, of which you are included, didnt constantly whine on about conspiricies and agendas I wouldnt feel the need to point out the obvious flaws in a lot of the points raised.
As pointed out above, where I agree then I will say so, where I read bullshit I will call it. Doesnt matter either way, its all about opinions.
Steady on old chum.
When you post comments like that it sounds as though you're declaring yourself to be the principled paragon of virtuous integrity and all embracing perspicacity.
The trouble is, such a halo requires constant polishing.
Word of the day calendar?
i can't even pronounce it!
mr_nool wrote:It's been used on three separate occasions on this forum. All three times by MC.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue Jam, BlueinBosnia, Google [Bot], ian494, john@staustell and 147 guests