DoomMerchant wrote:Slim wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:And Sterling was rated as the most valuable young player in Europe, so 45M isn't outrageous.
Not one other young player in Europe you can think of valued more? Not one? Okay then.
it wasn't me i was referring to genius, it was some fucking study conducted by whomever confuckingducted it. I'm sure you saw the link and article here in fact, as most of us did.
Here's a link to an article referencing it.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/33419234
My basic point is that what we paid for him is all relative to his value, and he's a very valuable commodity, so i don't have any issue with paying 45M for Sterling.
Do you disagree with that, dearest Slim?
cheers
http://zapsportz.com/raheem-sterling-th ... ss-survey/