patrickblue wrote:freshie wrote:patrickblue wrote:fangsanalsatan wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:b/c we're idiots and everyone knows it?
Haha. Kyle feckin Walker!
Trippier wasn't good enough for us, so we're going to spend a fortune on someone who's rapidly becoming his stand in.
I'd rather have Trippier. I think he is a better footballer than Walker - for me the only thing Walker has over Trippier is pace, however, Trippier's crossing and overall play is much better and he seems to be a much more intelligent footballer
My view as well, hence the sarky post.
Trippier is just not available anyway, if we wanted him, but I'm not certain he'd be Pep's choice anyway.
Crossing does not seem to be as big of a thing for fullbacks/wingbacks in Pep's system. We don't have a big striker to head said balls, and how many of those low crosses by Navas have been ticket's to nowhere since he's arrived. I don't think it's just his fault, it's also because of our lack of height. I think that's partially why Pep doesn't prioritise crossing from his fullbacks nor have them generally play so traditionally.
We don't use overlapping runs as we did in the past and it seems Pep likes his fullbacks to use their pace to create space and then be able to make a shorter pass to our attacking players who are ideally then in better positions. Clichy has done this when he plays, compared to our other fullbacks, but his passing has been very inconsistent or poor. Navas has made some crosses since he has played there, but he also seems instructed to bring the ball back inside as well.
Walker has a lot of pace, can dribble and beat his man, and is a good passer, especially with long diagonal balls that Pep wants his defenders to be able to make.
Defensively, he is also very good at interceptions, which is key to Pep's pressing (although I know Spurs do as well), and not too shabby in the air either.